Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Adrian Peterson deactivated AGAIN indefinitely


thunderraiden

Recommended Posts

Well then, someone needs to MAKE A DAMN DECISION. All this bullsh*t is really getting on my nerves. Either let him play and let the legal process play out or suspend Hardy. Either way, make a decision and stick to it. All this in-between bullsh*t and speculation needs to stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glazer is saying Hardy is next.

 

Barnwell also speculating the same.

 

This has big implications for us, like it or not.

 

AP was already indicted by a grand jury for a felony charge. There is also photo evidence of the abuse, similar to the Ray Rice video. Hardy hasn't even had a jury trial yet. His charge is only a misdemeanor with a bunch of he said/she said "evidence." With NC's 2-tiered legal system, Hardy is still presumed innocent despite what the media says. The NFLPA would also have a case against the NFL for issuing a 6 game punishment for a case still in the legal process.

 

For the record, I think Rivera will deactivate Hardy for the next 2 games. No way you can play Hardy on SNF Primetime especially after Bob Costas' rant last week about Hardy. The Ravens game will have a huge DV narrative if Hardy were to play.

 

IMO, incomplete legal process (half way through) = half of the 6 game suspension. In another 2 weeks, the media will move on from this DV narrative raging right now. Plus, I think Addison might be better for the team right now because Hardy must be extremely distracted and thinking about a lot of things other than football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AP was already indicted by a grand jury for a felony charge. There is also photo evidence of the abuse, similar to the Ray Rice video. Hardy hasn't even had a jury trial yet. His charge is only a misdemeanor with a bunch of he said/she said "evidence." With NC's 2-tiered legal system, Hardy is still presumed innocent despite what the media says. The NFLPA would also have a case against the NFL for issuing a 6 game punishment for a case still in the legal process.

 

For the record, I think Rivera will deactivate Hardy for the next 2 games. No way you can play Hardy on SNF Primetime especially after Bob Costas' rant last week about Hardy. The Ravens game will have a huge DV narrative if Hardy were to play.

 

IMO, incomplete legal process (half way through) = half of the 6 game suspension. In another 2 weeks, the media will move on from this DV narrative raging right now. Plus, I think Addison might be better for the team right now because Hardy must be extremely distracted and thinking about a lot of things other than football.

 

Again, Roger Goodell has stated many, many times, you do not have to be found guilty of anything to be suspended by the league. That's the way it goes. :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy poo. That's huge. Budweiser is a massive, massive, MASSIVE sponsor.

 

Greg Hardy is probably not going to play again this season.

 

This doesn't make any sense IMO. The punishment for DV first time offender is 6 game suspension. So, absolute worst case scenario is Hardy misses the next 6 games, right? Also, gotta remember even though Hardy's DV charge sounds graphic, it's still a misdemeanor.

 

If this were to happen, at least we have Addison for these next 2 games and we'll get Alexander back for final 4 games of Hardy's suspension. Ealy will have to step up. We would still get Hardy for both Falcons games, both Saints games, Seahawks game, and Philly game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is stupid.

There are dozens of players currently playing who have actually been convicted of DV. Yet nobody cares or even mentions it. This garbage isn't about DV or doing the right thing. It's about a lynch mob of losers who get off on pushing an agenda just to get their way and bully others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Roger all that. Do you think BY avoided any sacks last game? This oline is not what you're touting them to be. They are much better then 2023! Much much much better than 2023. But come on now, you'd expect this expensive oline (most are run blocking specialist) to at least dominate in the run game every game.  And... I keep telling you our WRs and TEs are not that good yet. I mean last Sunday was a prime example. Our receiving targets never make plays like those. Never. And this is from one of the worst teams in the league. Shough could have easily had 3 INTs if not for his receivers making plays on the ball. Our guys just don't do that. XL almost allowed an INT backing up out of bounds instead of coming to the ball. And everyone would have blamed that on BY. That's why he doesn't throw to that dude. I can't recall a game except maybe the second Falcons game - maybe, where I thought our receivers could possibly be better than the other team's. I think TMac and Coker have a lot of potential. But they're aren't consistent. But they're young and WILL improve. I'm confident of that.  I don't agree that BY was drafted to only stand in the pocket. He has always been best off schedule - for better or worse. 
    • Do you think you will get a direct answer?  Icky giving up 5 pressures (playing hurt in his defense) by himself and Bryce only getting sacked once tells you he played well in the pocket.  He extended plays and converted some tough downs.  
    • I've been very apprehensive about potentially firing yet another head coach. But Canales needs to focus on being a head coach first and foremost and begin handing off some responsibilities like playcalling duties and begin overseeing the entire team or we need to assess all possible ideal HC candidates in the offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...