Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Smith Is ON WFNZ Having A Confessional, Won't Let the Story End


FootballMaestro

Recommended Posts

Again, having an a--hole making the decisions hasn't affected New England.

 

 

that's one team out of 32, and I don't know there gm but does he come off as an ahole to the players?

 

in the case of the panthers i would rather have guys coming here because our gm is known for respecting players and being a fair but stern professional.

 

i don't want guys not coming here because our gm is a dick, a guy with dg's experience should know better on how to handle situations in the most professional way possible.

 

it our case we have a players coach with a dick of a gm, a bad match if you ask me

 

of course this is all pending that smith's statements are true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He went into GREAT detail on everything else.  He even mentioned Luke when he listed the players he had "respect" for on the Panthers.

 

He didn't mention, Cam.  You think he ACCIDENTALLY missed that detail? 

 

It wasn't an oversight.

 

I think he went into great enough detail with Cam, mentioning Newton didn't know he was cut; the letter; their text to each other, and the fact that they wouldn't hang out together with their age difference.

 

Regarding the guy's he respected/named; correct me if I'm wrong, they were all defenders (especially when he talked about blocking them)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listened to Bill Voth on The Mac attack this morning. So basically, Smitty Was Insubordinate (and you could kinda hear him acknowledging that in his interview). Gettleman asked him to calm down, be professional. Smitty didn't heed the warnings. So Gettleman cut him loose.

That undercuts Smith's version of events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's one team out of 32, and I don't know there gm but does he come off as an ahole to the players?

 

in the case of the panthers i would rather have guys coming here because our gm is known for respecting players and being a fair but stern professional.

 

i don't want guys not coming here because our gm is a dick, a guy with dg's experience should know better on how to handle situations in the most professional way possible.

 

it our case we have a players coach with a dick of a gm, a bad match if you ask me

 

of course this is all pending that smith's statements are true

 

The last GM we had was everybody's friend.  Where did that get us?

 

Belichick is the Patriots de facto GM, and he's far from the only guy with a rep for being a jerk.  Likewise, the Steelers are known to let popular players walk all the time.  That's two of the more perennially successful franchises in the league.  An all business approach doesn't seem to be hurting them.

 

To tell the truth, having a players coach (the guy directly dealing with the players most frequently) and a GM who's all business (the guy who has to make it all work) is actually an ideal combination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of the people we cut or didn't re-sign it is amazing that Smith was the only one that apparently got disrespected.

Getts reportedly had a meeting with Smith after the combine to clarify his comments and the Jerry Richardson personally took him out for breakfast or lunch, or dinner to talk to him about how appreciative he was for what he had accomplished just days before they released him. So the idea that Smith wasn't in the loop is highly unlikely.

Now... did everyone else get that kind of treatment? Very doubtful.

So much of what Smith says reeks of BS. I am not buying it.

 

Well Captain replied to question asking about everyone leaving Carolina with "it's a long story", but other than this I think Ginn stated he wasn't offered a new contract or even had communication with the Panther's management before Arizona offered him a deal, and didn't Beason learn he was traded through Twitter before talking with management as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From March 23, 2010, Smith being interviewed by David Scott in the Observer's "Inside the Panthers" section (link)

 

Interviewed Steve Smith earlier this evening. His thoughts on:

The Panthers releasing players like Jake Delhomme and Brad Hoover:

"First of all, it's a business. Unfortunately guys were released. That's sad news. I lost some friends. My wife lost some friends who are moving away. That was unexpected. But one day, I'm going to be released as well. It's part of the game."

If it came as a surprise:

"Every year...there are some surprises. To say one was particularly surprising...this is a 'what you have you done for me lately' league and 'you're only as good as you're last game.' So hearing this on our team or another team, it doesn't surprise me. You can retire, get cut before you retire or get hurt. It's going to happen."

 

Scott Fowler commented on Smith's demeanor (link)

 

You can read more of the interview here if you scroll down to the March 23 entries, but I thought in general Smith was on his best behavior in the interview. He's getting a little more politically adept, as you would expect of the team's union leader. Smith simply said "I lost some friends" about all the Panthers' personnel moves, noting: "One day, I'm going to be released as well. It's part of the game."

 

So apparently when other people get released, "it's a business" and that's just "part of the game".

 

But now it's personal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...