Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Darrin Reaves


t96

Recommended Posts

He ran very very well today, breaking through contact and always running forward and not sideways. I think if Stew and DeAngelo both miss extended time then Reaves is good enough to step in and help out our run game. The interior of the line played very well today too which helped him but Reaves was great. Curious as to why Fozzy didn't get a carry. Thoughts on whether Fozzy or Reaves should be our guy next week if Stew can't go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fozzy was active but I think it was an emergency type of deal and they never intended to use him. Reaves started playing well and was replaced by obi for some reason. I think our RBs are good enough to win with if the oline can get it's poo together

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My biggest question is why Reaves, a nobody, can run behind this line, but the dynamic duo can't seem to stop breakdancing in the backfield long enough to gain positive yardage?

 

he had 11 carries for 35 yards. stewart and williams have both performed better this year (against better defenses and in gloomier situations). they're just injured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My biggest question is why Reaves, a nobody, can run behind this line, but the dynamic duo can't seem to stop breakdancing in the backfield long enough to gain positive yardage?

One group is working week to week & literally playing for their career & livelihood, the other group is raking in 10s of millions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...