Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much has our D struggled lately?


heelsrule1988

Recommended Posts

The D is really, really bad right now.  They've played one half of good defense in the last four games.  I was really hoping that the 2nd half against the Bears was a sign that they were getting things figured out, but today's game erased that hope.  We've given up 30+ in four straight games.  We held our opponents to 14 points and 7 points respectively in the first two weeks.  Does Hardy really make THAT much of a difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It all starts up front at the line of scrimmage being unable to put pressure on the quarterback,because a below average secondary gets light up like a christmas tree and one of the best linebacking corps in the NFL is stuck right smack dab in the middle of a sh.. storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Calling our secondary below average is being kind.  They're terrible.  Unfortunately, we rely on front seven play to cover up for that and our DL play has been far from stellar.  Short is really the only DL we have who has stood out this season.  I think CJ is more limited by his injuries than we're letting on and I'm not sure what's going on with Star.  With Star's style, he may just be easier for teams to game plan away from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah we were bad, but we were finally pretty good in run defense, of course the stats won't show that because of big 89 yard run but other that that play we did pretty good against the run and kept them in third and long.

Of course they kept converting them tho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that we held the Lions to 7 points is amazing to me. The AFCN just seems to have our number:

 

Opp PPG (AFCN): 37.3

Opp PPG (NFC): 15.0

 

Hopefully it's due to lack of game planning or something like that specific to the AFC. I can't imagine that Hardy, while valuable, was straight up the linchpin of this defense. 

 

Wish Frank Alexander wasn't a knucklehead. We could really use him right about now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greg Hardy is one of the best if not the best pass rushers in the game right now,and Frank Alexander could more than likely be starting in CJs place.so your stuck with two stud DTs only in their second year,having to try and do way too much in order to compensate for the guys playing beside them on that defensive front.can you imagine KK besides Hardy and offensive lines not having their hands full?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Believe me,this aint about poor coaching from the reigning NFL coach of the year and McDermott.its about the lack of or loss of talent up front.Why,do you think DG which is a man of few words said thats where you win the battle at the line of scrimmage and gave a cash strapped team 13.1 million dollars to one player and cut just about everyone else because of money.IMO,DG is absolutley right because better defenses are more likely to win the superbowl,why,because for one its a fact and two it has a greater impact on the scoreboard at the end of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...