Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Packers Fans are Saying


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

https://www.packerforum.com/threads/official-packers-vs-panthers.55189/

 

 

 

Hope our CBs aren't seriously hurt and that it was just heat cramps or something frown.png Gonna be a tough matchup on Benjamin and Olsen, particularly if we are keeping a linebacker or safety down low to try and keep contain on Super Cam.

 

 

 

 

Unless we figure out how to defense a mobile QB, this game will be like the Dolphins game.

Carolina's defense is ranked 27th (23 against pass; 27 against run) by Pro Football Focus after the first 5 weeks, so I expect the offensive line to show up. We should be able to control the LOS against a below average defensive front.

Packers 37 Panthers 27

 

 

 

 

The Panthers have given up a lot of points in the last four weeks not playing Rodgers.

I expect a big game for Rodgers and we win if we slow them down just a little.

37-26 Packers.

 

 

 

Carolina has no real weapons besides Cam Newton's read-option and Greg Olson. Receivers are marginal and RBs are terrible. There defense without Hardy, Munerlyn, and their safety (can't remember name) has been a complete opposite of last year. This is not last year's team with a superb defense and multi-headed running attack to support Cam Newton. This is the Cam Newton show with a bunch of off-off-off Broadway actors that you've never heard of.

It will still be a game but the Packers win easily in the end. No last-second drama

 

 

 

Simple solution:

Bench Brad Jones

Double Cover Greg Olsen

Do we chip off on Charles Johnson with one of our RBs or TEs to help the O-line? Or do we try and neutralize one of their LBs like Keuchly or Blackburn?

 

 

 

Greg Olson can catch a ball thrown to him. ... but the guy is not really much of a weapon in terms of a guy you need to game plan around. Certainly not the way I think of great TE that require double teams and full attention.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Packer fans are some of the classiest I have ever been around. Go to their stadium and watch a game if u ever get a chance. Awesome place and it's set up great!

They have the museum down stairs that is incredibly set up and does a great job of telling the history of the team

Weird though, the stadium still has bench seating like a HS stadium, kinda cool I guess but will provide a cold ass in the winter time. Lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Packer fans are some of the classiest I have ever been around. Go to their stadium and watch a game if u ever get a chance. Awesome place and it's set up great!

They have the museum down stairs that is incredibly set up and does a great job of telling the history of the team

Weird though, the stadium still has bench seating like a HS stadium, kinda cool I guess but will provide a cold ass in the winter time. Lol.

I had a friend who's father worked on building the stadium and he said they kept the seating that way to keep the fans more into the game. They'll be more eager to get on their feet because they won't be very comfortable sitting down on those. I don't know if that's true or not but it does make some sense.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the "off Broadway" comment too,but I think it's more about maturation than a less talented team. If our defense can start to work together and show improvement, we can make a game of it.

 

I do own some  (fake) stock in the Meat Packers, they are the only publicly owned teams- but I hope we can play well and sneak out a win in the Q4.

 

and it's Philly time...we need some field position in this game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greg Olsen....forever underrated.

I'd like to see the Packers not gameplan for him.

Also, they mentioned our great RBs last season. All it was was a healthy Cam making our rush attack what it was....like the dude we saw last week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
×
×
  • Create New...