Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Division Title at 7-8-1?


Carolina Cajun

Recommended Posts

So, yesterday on ESPN radio, the national guys were talking about the NFCS and how poor it was.  They began discussing what it will take to win the division, and one of the guy really believed that we could win the division at 7-8-1.  That got me thinking, how would everyone feel about that?  I saw a lot of discussion in the offseason about finally having back to back winning seasons, even if we didn't make the playoffs, but with the way things are going, there is a possibility that just the opposite could happen.  I personally don't think it will, but thought the point being made was worthy of a conversation.  I also figured this would break up some of the Harper Sucks, Cason Sucks, and Bell Sucks discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three years from now when we remember this team as the first team to ever win b2b NFCS and the first Panther team with b2b winning seasons, is anyone really going to remember how bad we were?

 

I agree.  Win is a win and if the division is won with 8, so be it.  It's happened before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the negativity around here is at an all time high.

If you told me we'd start out 3-3-1 after 7 weeks, I'd have been disappointed, but some of y'all are just really trippin. We're going to turn this thing around.

We will continue to send the SeaChickens into their downward spiral, and I predict a "pie to everyone" thread by 4 pm Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the negativity around here is at an all time high.

If you told me we'd start out 3-3-1 after 7 weeks, I'd have been disappointed, but some of y'all are just really trippin. We're going to turn this thing around.

We will continue to send the SeaChickens into their downward spiral, and I predict a "pie to everyone" thread by 4 pm Sunday.

 

Historically, the team hasn't been able to "turn it around".  Year after year it's the same poo and some skepticism is ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three years from now when we remember this team as the first team to ever win b2b NFCS and the first Panther team with b2b winning seasons, is anyone really going to remember how bad we were?

Would 7-8-1 be considered a winning season? Because technically it's not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the least possible outcomes, this is what's up

 

Seachickens - Loss

vs Saints - Win

@ Philly - LOSS

vs Falcons - Win

@ Vikings - Win

@ Saints - Loss

vs Bucs - Win

vs Browns - Win

@ Falcons - Win

 

think 9-6-1 could be possible, but yeah, given a flop against the browns and falcons 7-8-1 is more than possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ain't have it much worse

 

Green Bay - Loss

Us - Loss

Niners - Loss

Bungals - Loss

Ravens - Loss

@ Steelers - Loss

Us - Win

@ Bears - Loss (i just see it, esp in december at night)

vs Falcons - Win

@ Bucs - Win

 

 

thank god they have a poo schedule. The Falcons don't even count so they aren't worth posting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the least possible outcomes, this is what's up

Seachickens - Loss

vs Saints - Win

@ Philly - LOSS

vs Falcons - Win

@ Vikings - Win

@ Saints - Loss

vs Bucs - Win

vs Browns - Win

@ Falcons - Win

think 9-6-1 could be possible, but yeah, given a flop against the browns and falcons 7-8-1 is more than possible.

It really does all hinge on the Saints game next Thursday. Win that one and we are set up nicely to take care of business. Lose and it's back to hoping the division can be historically bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is the best reason for drafting a T--Moton's knee is also a big concern for me--I am not sure if it is still justified, but leg injuries for big men can be degenerative.  I have argued against it--I think Morgan will think it has been addressed and will draft a Late-round OT with upside.  Forsythe?  What the hell was that?  I am leaning WR (guessing what they might do) because they really don't have a Z WR, based on Cosell's description of the position. TE is in play.  DT is in play.  The thing I am most confident about?  LB in round 2.
    • I think they wanted to dispell the rumors of his work ethic, but that is speculation.  Interesting point.  I am thinking (right now) that they might go WR again.  
    • Personally, I have argued that the pick is probably unlikely to be an OT in an effort to read the tea leaves, but I am an OL fanatic and would get it. By now, they probably have info about Ickey and I think the decision will be based on the likelihood of his return to form by 2027.   Thanks to Cosell, I am more inclined to lean towards the Z WR and Concepcion or Cooper.  After he explained it, I felt that it is a need.   DT could easily be the pick.  Who did we get to replace Robinson?  I think any GM looks to upgrade a position, not simply replace.  That would suggest an early draft pick, maybe? I am not happy about having Scott back.  Please tell me that was a depth move.   When it comes to TE, I pray we don't love Sadiq.   I doubt it is a CB, C, or Edge, but if an elite CB or Edge fell to us....(to your point). I think we could try to trade back if there is a market.  
×
×
  • Create New...