Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Serious Question about righting this roster

TANTRIC-NINJA

By TANTRIC-NINJA,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TANTRIC-NINJA Community Regular

TANTRIC-NINJA

Posted
Posted

As we know there are the extentions of Cam/Kuchley looming over the head of this franchise. IMO with the current cap situation, extensions and having to retool the secondary, OL and WRS how long is it going to take to get this roster playoff bound.

The realites:

Greg Olsen FA and aged

Thomas Davis FA and aged

Kalil not a dominant player and paid at an elite level.

Charles Johnson not the same.guy after that damn leg whip in NE.

Need for a new DE.

Will Star return to his rookie form?

In need of another Lber too esp if TD is not retained.

I see three more seasons until we get back so if that IS the case..do you extend Cam to a big contract or reset this thing? As Gettles prob wanted all along.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhoAmI? Newbie

WhoAmI?

Posted
Posted

Like I have said all along yet people keep bashing me for it, trade Cam for a buttload of draft picks because it is going to take a lot more players to field a good team than an inconsistent QB. You know how much a team would give up for Cam just for the name alone? A whole lot. Cam is replaceable regardless of what these blind Cam homers say how good he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Diehardpanther02 Newbie

Diehardpanther02

Posted
Posted

Like I have said all along yet people keep bashing me for it, trade Cam for a buttload of draft picks because it is going to take a lot more players to field a good team than an inconsistent QB. You know how much a team would give up for Cam just for the name alone? A whole lot. Cam is replaceable regardless of what these blind Cam homers say how good he is.

Yeah cam is replaceable, the best qb we have had in franchise history is replaceable. Do you know how dumb that sounds?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NJPanthers12 Proficient

NJPanthers12

Posted
Posted

Like I have said all along yet people keep bashing me for it, trade Cam for a buttload of draft picks because it is going to take a lot more players to field a good team than an inconsistent QB. You know how much a team would give up for Cam just for the name alone? A whole lot. Cam is replaceable regardless of what these blind Cam homers say how good he is.

 

lets keep bashing him for this comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhoAmI? Newbie

WhoAmI?

Posted
Posted

Yeah cam is replaceable, the best qb we have had in franchise history is replaceable. Do you know how dumb that sounds?

 

Sad that the best QB we have had in franchise history is a mediocre passer. Just shows you how pathetic this franchise has been.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Diehardpanther02 Newbie

Diehardpanther02

Posted
Posted

Sad that the best QB we have had in franchise history is a mediocre passer. Just shows you how pathetic this franchise has been.

Mediocre passer with less than mediocre, line less than mediocre pass catchers, and less than mediocre play calling. And thats to

Put it nicely. Im sure you were on cams balls last year when he dominated with a halfway competent supporting cast. This team is ass and thats the problem. Not cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhoAmI? Newbie

WhoAmI?

Posted
Posted

Mediocre passer with less than mediocre, line less than mediocre pass catchers, and less than mediocre play calling. And thats to

Put it nicely. Im sure you were on cams balls last year when he dominated with a halfway competent supporting cast. This team is ass and thats the problem. Not cam.

 

Nope. I'm not one of you people that switch their opinion about someone every other year. I have said this from the beginning. I have always doubted his consistency and accuracy since he has gotten here and it has not changed. Oh, and BTW, Cam didn't dominate last year. He played very well, but mostly got carried by our once elite defense.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • strato
      Off-season topic: WWYD? Total Branding Redesign

      By strato · Posted

      Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • csx
      Baldinger on the 2026 LB Class

      By csx · Posted

      We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...