Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Shanahan


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

So a little while back, I talked about the notion of bringing a possibly-soon-to-be-former head coach with previous ties to Dave Gettleman into the front office in a personnel role () if Gettleman were to decide the front office needed some changes made.

 

Here's another possibility in that same vein.

 

Mike Shanahan is the coach that brought Gettleman his first experience as part of a Super Bowl winning organization.  Gettleman was a scout with the Broncos when Shanahan coached John Elway and the Broncos to their first Super Bowl victory.

 

Shanahan's most recent job was with the Redskins coaching suspected coach killer RG3.  At the time, Shanahan was not only the head coach, but held the title Vice President of Football Operations and had final say on personnel matters.

 

Shanahan's son Kyle and protege' Gary Kubiak are both expected to be hot head coaching candidates in 2015, with one or both conceivably interviewing for the Panthers job (assuming it comes open).  Dave Gettleman and Kubiak were colleagues for three years in Denver and he'd be acquainted with Kyle through his dad.

 

So how would you feel about having the elder Shanahan onboard in a front office type role?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too much like Holmgren, imo: not honestly that great, overall, as a HC and given a promotion he didn't necessarily earn or excel in.

 

I was just wondering what he's up to these days, but, I wouldn't care for him in a role like that here.

 

Parcells is of course the obvious choice, but I have no idea who a younger, hungrier version of Parcells would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too much like Holmgren, imo: not honestly that great, overall, as a HC and given a promotion he didn't necessarily earn or excel in.

 

I was just wondering what he's up to these days, but, I wouldn't care for him in a role like that here.

 

Parcells is of course the obvious choice, but I have no idea who a younger, hungrier version of Parcells would be.

 

 

Bill Belichick 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like an assistant to DG?

 

Most likely options would be running the Pro Personnel department or in a newly created Player Personnel role overseeing both the College Scouting and Pro Personnel departments, similar to what he did in Washington.

 

(same options I suggested with Coughlin)

 

In that capacity, Shanahan could also serve as a head coaching resource to a new young coach (like say, his son).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shanahan's most recent job was with the Redskins coaching suspected coach killer RG3.  At the time, Shanahan was not only the head coach, but held the title Vice President of Football Operations and had final say on personnel matters.

 

And the teams record those 3 years he was there?

 

24-40.

 

Keep him far away from this franchise. We've had enough mediocrity and ineptitude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love to hire Kyle Shanahan, and I assume that would involve Mike coming in as an offensive consultant.

 

Kyle Shanahan getting the head coaching job means, in all likelihood, some sort of role for his dad.

 

Gary Kubiak getting the job makes that possible too, but nowhere near as likely.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too much like Holmgren, imo: not honestly that great, overall, as a HC and given a promotion he didn't necessarily earn or excel in.

 

 

 

 

Don't insult Holmgren like that... :)

 

 

 

 

There are some people who had always said that Shanahan was overrated. After Washington, I tend to believe them.  I want people in Charlotte that at least I can fool myself into thinking that they know what they're doing.  Shanahan does not pass the test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yards a game works better over a longer period of time as well. Averages always work out over the long run. The smaller the sample size the easier it is to skew. Also opponents matter more when the size is small. Player 1 lights up 2 bad defenses in 4 starts vs Player 2 playing 10 games vs multiple defenses. It hard to make it apples to apples how it currently sits. Remember during Bryce’s little run last year how annoyed you were when people were pulling Bryce’s starts from week 9 on vs the whole season. 
    • Someone else claimed I said EVERY.  Literally in my post breaking it down it gave Bryce TDs per game.   Shough however has the majority in his favor if just looking at starts. whats subjective about comp %, yards, QB ratings and turnovers?  Now I guess the argument one might make off them could be subjective.  But all I’m saying is statistically as a starter he has been better this year overall.  I don’t think Shough is great.  I think he is impressive based on the situation.  2nd rounder stepping in on a bad team.   And he like so many other QBs…..serves as little red flag going off about what we are doing here offensively. 
    • Player A - 2 starts.  200 yards in each start. He averages 200 yards a game.  Player B - 1 start.  Throws for 400 yards.  Comes in another random game and has 1 pass attempt on a Hail Mary to end the game that goes incomplete.   Now given the random game he appeared for a snap, he averages 200 yards a game. Thats why you isolate starts. If you are talking starter vs someone who began as a backup.  Simple made up numbers/situations to illustrate the point. 
×
×
  • Create New...