Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So, if we win the South, who do we host?


SIGCHI222

Recommended Posts

I have fun with this thing every year: http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/machine

Pulling for Seattle and Detroit from here. Arizona can finish 1-1 or 0-2 and still finish 5th, so we'd host them.

Detroit plays Green Bay in Week 17 and that should be the difference between the 2nd and 6th seeds. So if we got past Arizona we'd then play Detroit, who we've already beaten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the only team I really wouldn't want to play is the Packers

 

 

We always play the Seahawks close, we've already beaten Detroit this year, we killed ourselves verse Philly and Mark Sanchez is not that good, and the Cardinals would obviously be the most ideal 

 

My order of wanting to play is:

 

Arizona

Philly

Detroit

Seattle

Green Bay 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool story bro

Tell that again and see if I give a fugg

Your antics don't work w. Me ;)

Apparently they do as I got you to respond.

You say something stupid...someone calls you on it...you get prissy. Yep....it works on you too.

If you are a guy and use tip off in a football discussion, you deserve to be shamed mercilessly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...