Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

RR: OC Shula did a good job at end of the season


Jmac

Recommended Posts

The reason Shula was "better" was because they let Cam control the offense on nearly 100% of scoring drives.

Where have you been for the past 2 years. Shula lets Cam audiblize and calls plays based on what he sees at the line of scrimmage. He has done that all along. As Cam continues to learn and grow so will the offense. That is his philosophy and what he has emphasized. As Cam got healthy so did the offense.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chud after 2 years get a head coach position. If Ron get fired, he'll be atleast one of sought-after defensive coordinators. McDermott being requested for interviews

Who the fug wants Mike Shula? Nobody

And Chud got promptly fired after 1 year. What if Shula had more to do with our success than Chud given Cam kept improving and Cleveland never developed a QB under Chud. Maybe Chud's attitude about being so great and smart bit him in the ass when his offense and team never materialized.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle is successful because they adapt and are flexible. Not to mention a better defense and run game, requirements for ball control.

Ball control works if you break down the game and use it smartly when it needs to be used, and don't use it when it doesn't- in other words still being able to change, adapt and stay competitive even when things aren't going your way controlling TOP.

Shula views the entire game, before it starts as one big time clock. The entire game is about controlling possession from the first play to the last. There is absolutely no room for adapting and being flexible. If our run game lacks we are screwed, if we are down by any points by the fourth quarter, we lose. If we don't have half a quarter to score we lose.

A classic Shula game is getting down in points and seeing the herp derp plays called all of a sudden because Shula has no CLUE how to adapt and catch up when he isn't ahead and controlling the clock.You can easily go back and watch games and know exactly when Shula is starting to panic and call these plays, it's incredibly obvious.

Above all, we have Cam Newton and are trying to run this garbage. It seems so very stupid to put Cam in that kind of play calling. Seattle's Wilson is almost built for it but nothing about Cam is in my opinion.

Another long diatribe with no evidence to back it up. If we were all about ball control then we would have come out running every game and would have run more than we threw. We actually threw almost 75 times more than we ran.

If we were down in the fourth quarter then Cam would have never brought us back yet he did this year and last on numerous occasions. (It isn't the offense's fault if we can't keep a lead).

If what you said is true we would have been terrible in the hurry up and the 2 minute offense. Yet that was not the case and we had a number of quick scoring drives and Cam looked best in the hurry up offense.

What is obvious is that many posters don't have a clue,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Chud got promptly fired after 1 year. What if Shula had more to do with our success than Chud given Cam kept improving and Cleveland never developed a QB under Chud. Maybe Chud's attitude about being so great and smart bit him in the ass when his offense and team never materialized.

 

That's cool. But who wants Mike Shula?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's cool. But who wants Mike Shula?

I can Think of several teams with incredibly poor quarterbacks who might jump at the chance that Shula could do for their quarterback what he did for Newton. Off the top of my head teams like Jacksonville, the Jets, Buffalo etc have quarterbacks who have never blossomed like Cam did. They would be smart to get someone like Shula to help develop their team.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can Think of several teams with incredibly poor quarterbacks who might jump at the chance that Shula could do for their quarterback what he did for Newton. Off the top of my head teams like Jacksonville, the Jets, Buffalo etc have quarterbacks who have never blossomed like Cam did. They would be smart to get someone like Shula to help develop their team.

 

You right, he's a QB coach. He belongs there. Not offensive coordinator. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You right, he's a QB coach. He belongs there. Not offensive coordinator.

They go hand in hand. Say what you want but Cam is light years ahead of Kaepernick in terms of understanding defenses. And he knows how to scan the field and find the open guy. Once we get the players we need to run this offense we will have one of the most efficient like we did in 2013.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, Shula needs to swallow his damn pride and set up some time with Gus Malzahn in the offseason.  Its obvious that Shula WANTS to at times use Cam's unique athletic gifts and skills, but its also obvious that he doesn't have a single clue as to how to accomplish that.

 

Answer:  Talk to the man who has those clues.

 

Now that doesn't mean I think Shula should throw out his playbook and completely replace it with Malzahn's.  But at the very least he could better understand the concepts of the read-option, HOW to use it, WHEN to use it, utilization of the jet-sweep, the WR route-tree out of the Malzahn concepts, the utility of going no-huddle with a QB like Cam, and better implement those concepts into Carolina's playbook.

 

Do I think Shula will?  Or that he would even think of doing such a thing?

Unfortunately, no.  Maybe if hell froze over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not surprised, but a shame that we are willing to accept that kind of inepitude with so many jobs riding on it.

Shula's archaic crawlball offense simply isnt cut out for today's NFL. His "clock control" offense just doesnt work anymore.

There are too many moving parts that have to be perfect all drive for it to yield 7 and defenses are too aggressive.

It's done, but we're still desperatley trying to lead the league in T.O.P. rather than points scored or wins.

 

 

So much this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, this year we should've easily been a playoff team in my opinion. We should have easily had two or three more wins--at least one--had not Bryce crapped the bed. But let's be serious about human nature and what we know about our FO. I wouldn't bet the farm that Bryce will be anything but the defacto starter in 2026, because (inconsistent though it was) we have exceeded expectations this year, and some in the FO probably believe, rightly or wrongly, that Bryce is at the center of that. You know, piece of bread seems like a meal if all you've had is a cracker. That being said, Bryce has shown plenty of inconsistency if not a downright pattern of flaws. He's a third year QB, and some, if not most, of his metrics aren't pretty. It could be argued that he should be further along (for me it's not really arguable). So, hopefully the decision makers will acquire a couple of plan Bs. I would hate it and love it if we identified "our guy" in the draft, and that it was somehow achievable to acquire him with a couple of high draft picks or even less. But we already pulled the trigger on Bryce with arguably awful results, so that's got to make the decision makers a little skittish to repeat a mistake that should be still fresh on everyone's mind. That being said, I think that it's more likely that we acquire a player like Mac Jones, Malik Willis or Trey Lance in free agency, and also target a day two or day three developmental pick in the draft with some real upside. That pick for would be Drew Allar who should slide to day three (I'm thinking). I think that this is more realistic than them releasing Bryce from his starter's role from the get-go, or someone just flat out playing themselves definitely into the starter's role by the time the season begins.  Now, again, if we can find "our guy" that changes the narrative and is expected to be the starter from day one, I'd be excited, if not downright ecstatic, but I don't think that's a realistic expectation.  Getting back to the team in general, If we don't make some improvements, including QB, I wouldn't bet that we'd necessarily be a playoff team next year, because, the rest of the NFCS is likely to improve next year. I don't expect that teams in our division will be necessarily able to "backdoor" themselves into the playoffs next season. So we're going to have to hit on at least a couple of picks, get healthy along the line, and fundamentally change the way we're calling plays because lightning probably isn't striking twice. I'm hoping that we'll have a real breakthrough season by 2028, because this season and next season aren't likely to be it because removing ball-and-chains ain't easy unless you got the key, and It's still gonna take some time to find it.
    • Necas is not the missing piece here.
×
×
  • Create New...