Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Am I the only one that thinks the Nate Chandler to OT should be put to death?

WOW!!

By WOW!!,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted

I know PFF stats say Bell was the worst OT last year...but my eyes say Chandler was man handled and thrown like a rag doll regularly. .. It was scary watching a man that big get toss like a basketball every other play.. I still don't understand what the FO and coaching staff saw from him in Training Camp to give him a starting job let alone a contract. . Maybe he can go back to DT..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted

how terrifying is it that as bad as Chandler was, Bell was worse.

we could put two stop signs at both OT spots and get better pass protection.

even more optimistically, i am excited to see the strides this offense will make with improved OT play (which is a given no matter who we put there)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
magnus Rookie

magnus

Posted
Posted

there were times Chandler struggled.  He's cheap, he's a decent backup who played well at guard, which is full-up, so what do you lose by not cutting him?  Remmers should beat him out, and then God forbid you actually have depth behind him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I don't know where the hell you got the idea that you were the only who thinks this.

Another self absorbed Reece post where you think something you thought of is original.

Another person feeling the need to talk to me personally instead of participating in the discussion. .

Are you my ex...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MCC Newbie

MCC

Posted
Posted

Another person feeling the need to talk to me personally instead of participating in the discussion. .

Are you my ex...

Nope, I exist.

And why participate in a "discussion" in which there is nothing to discuss.

Everyone knows that Chandler was a disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Captain Morgan
      OTA's

      By Captain Morgan · Posted

      Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • WUnderhill
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...