Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tales from the Cript: Lance Metrics


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

in actuality, its not that bad of a contract.. compared to some of the worst everrrrrrrrrr:

 

Lance Stephenson- Hornets (3 years, $27 million)

------------------------------------------------------------------

DeSagana Diop- Mavericks/Bobcats (6 years, $32 million)

Josh Smith- Detroit (4 years, $54 million)

Eddie Curry- Knicks (6 years, $60 million)

Larry Hughes - Cavaliers (5 years, $70 million)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and finally....

 

 

 

 

Gilbert Arenas- Wizards (6 years, $111 million)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in actuality, its not that bad of a contract.. compared to some of the worst everrrrrrrrrr:

Lance Stephenson- Hornets (3 years, $27 million)

------------------------------------------------------------------

DeSagana Diop- Mavericks/Bobcats (6 years, $32 million)

Josh Smith- Detroit (4 years, $54 million)

Eddie Curry- Knicks (6 years, $60 million)

Larry Hughes - Cavaliers (5 years, $70 million)

and finally....

Gilbert Arenas- Wizards (6 years, $111 million)

As a Dubs fan of like to throw the Adonal Foyle and Andrus Beidrins contracts in for consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried warning people Lance is just a flashier version of Gerald Henderson. They are the worst shooting wings in the NBA. They are even worse than MKG.

Henderson and MKG have been miles better tjan Lance this year. At this point Lance's offensive skills are comparable to Ben Wallace but without the defensive presence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think lance is still hurt from his pelvic or hamstring pull. I think the all start break will be good for him. I think when he comes back you will see him playing defense of a mad man. Then he will be a pass first gaurd with some streaky shooting but will be more consistent then he was. Or it wouldn't suprise me lance comes back out of shape. I never know with this guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think lance is still hurt from his pelvic or hamstring pull. I think the all start break will be good for him. I think when he comes back you will see him playing defense of a mad man. Then he will be a pass first gaurd with some streaky shooting but will be more consistent then he was. Or it wouldn't suprise me lance comes back out of shape. I never know with this guy

Don't get your hopes up for anything from Lance. The dude is pretty much a bum now, which is incredibly disappointing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...