Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Blue Chip" players


tim

Recommended Posts

Interesting that our blue chips are spread out over every level of the offense and defense. We're the only team with a blue chip in each level of defense (D-line, LBers, secondary) and offense (O-line, Wr, backfield). Can't agree with him on the Lewis as an almost blue chip though, the guy is just average as a 3 down player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting that our blue chips are spread out over every level of the offense and defense. We're the only team with a blue chip in each level of defense (D-line, LBers, secondary) and offense (O-line, Wr, backfield). Can't agree with him on the Lewis as an almost blue chip though, the guy is just average as a 3 down player.

I agree with you there. I also agree with Gantt that I would put Davis in the almost blue-chipper group. I would probably put Godfrey in the almost blue-chipper group instead of the blue-chipper. He is a really good corner, but how many games has he changed the outcome of?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you there. I also agree with Gantt that I would put Davis in the almost blue-chipper group. I would probably put Godfrey in the almost blue-chipper group instead of the blue-chipper. He is a really good corner, but how many games has he changed the outcome of?

in his earlier years he iced a lot of games but wasn't as good of a corner. Teams wern't scared of him and he got a lot of picks because of that.

Now he holds down one side of the field down and still gets a few throws but teams definatley respect him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you there. I also agree with Gantt that I would put Davis in the almost blue-chipper group. I would probably put Godfrey in the almost blue-chipper group instead of the blue-chipper. He is a really good corner, but how many games has he changed the outcome of?

you mean gamble?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really a positive IMO

It's just like playing RISK.

strong armies are nice to have but if they are not spread evenly or are scattered it's hard to gain ground without a master strategist and even then it's pretty tough.

Whereas if you concentrate your big armies in one area you can strategize, slow-play, and really become a force by playing to your strengths.

having a blue chip at every level seems nice but can be a negative if your "holes" are exploited and the blue chips (big armies) exhaust too much of the finite resources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nope, that’s not the disconnect. In 2022, our GM knew he was going QB in the 2023 draft. You are talking about risking fans involvement on a team that’s been basically bottom 3 in the NFL from 2018 to now. There is no risk when you are that bad. We were right to want Fitterer to tank in 2022 and get rid of anyone who could bring us big value and extra cap room for future years when we aren’t winning 2-7 wins a year. We knew we wanted a rookie QB so we didn’t trade assets for picks and get a better draft slot so we ended up only getting a 2nd for Burns and threw in DJ Moore plus an early 2nd instead of a 1st, which basically lost us an early 2nd. The “risk” to our franchise’s losing culture ended up being around 4 1sts of total value. Yep, I refuse to listen to the other perspective that lost us around 4 1sts of value. At least our fan involvement is so high that our stadium isn’t chock full of visiting fans since we’ve won so much since 2022. Again, you won’t change my mind that we should have tanked in 2022 and had another 2-4 Browns/Horns on this team.
    • 2006 rematch if Canes and Oilers advance
    • It was the Colts that pulled theirs. Colts did Minecraft video without getting Microsoft’s permission (Chargers did get their permission). The questionable content was having the coast guard stop tyreek hill.
×
×
  • Create New...