Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Supergirl

Jangler

By Jangler,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
PandaPancake Newbie

PandaPancake

Posted
Posted

I wish they would do away with female versions of already established male characters. How about a new original female character? Same goes for changing spiderman or whoever into a gay or other race. Make a new original cool character.

$5 says you're a kid or that loud woman from F&F

Link to comment
Share on other sites
shreddingdefense Newbie

shreddingdefense

Posted
Posted

$5 says you're a kid or that loud woman from F&F

 

neither. I just find it annoying that when a new character is introduced they use an already made moniker. Just look at batman. Batman (more than bruce have took that mantle), batwoman,and batgirl, i'm sure there are more than that though. batman goes back in time and is shown to be a pirate at one point. Hell all that is missing is batdog.

 

As for supergirl, why must the suit copy the same design as superman? It is nowhere as original as it should be. Basical superman with a different gender,  nothing more or less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PandaPancake Newbie

PandaPancake

Posted
Posted

neither. I just find it annoying that when a new character is introduced they use an already made moniker. Just look at batman. Batman (more than bruce have took that mantle), batwoman,and batgirl, i'm sure there are more than that though. batman goes back in time and is shown to be a pirate at one point. Hell all that is missing is batdog.

 

As for supergirl, why must the suit copy the same design as superman? It is nowhere as original as it should be. Basical superman with a different gender,  nothing more or less.

 

Don't like it? Go back to 1958 and stop them.

 

Get the fug out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      So... what metrics for production do you believe display these issues/limitations best? Are we only using total passing yards, height, and weight thresholds? If so, then what are those thresholds?
    • frankw
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By frankw · Posted

      I mean as far as his size goes it's all over his tape bouncing up and down on his toes in and around the pocket trying to see the field and defenses know this as well as we do but if folks here want to live in never never land and pretend it's not a thing that's their prerogative. Even our head coach has made it a key focal point to get his footwork under control. But it's still something Bryce is going to be tested on early and often no matter how many keystrokes anyone here commits to the narrative it isn't an issue.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      It speaks volumes that when asked to define a clear performance threshold the responses instead fixate on Bryce's size. It reinforces what’s been clear for a while now... that for some, it has never been nor will it ever be about production. Any struggles will always be chalked up to his frame, and any strong play will be downplayed or disqualified via highly mobile goalposts.
×
×
  • Create New...