Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Automotive Window Tinting

Dex

By Dex,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Dex Collaborator

Dex

Posted
Posted

So I'm getting my car windows tinted in a couple weeks and I was wondering what brands and types of films I should go with? I don't want to spend anymore than $350ish so 3M Crystalline might be out but I'd like to hear other's opinions. I'll be going 35% on the front and back windows with 20% on the rear window if that matters in cost or film. Also I have a new Accord that has GPS/Pandora so no metallic films please.

I also WILL NOT be installing it myself. Different tint places use different brands so I'm using this thread to shop around for places.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ja Rhule Grand Master

Ja Rhule

Posted
Posted

So I'm getting my car windows tinted in a couple weeks and I was wondering what brands and types of films I should go with? I don't want to spend anymore than $350ish so 3M Crystalline might be out but I'd like to hear other's opinions. I'll be going 35% on the front and back windows with 20% on the rear window if that matters in cost or film. Also I have a new Accord that has GPS/Pandora so no metallic films please.

I also WILL NOT be installing it myself. Different tint places use different brands so I'm using this thread to shop around for places.

I got ceramic at sun stoppers for $300 that also blocks heat. 5 years later, no complaints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
toldozer Grand Master

toldozer

Posted
Posted

I don't think brand matters as much as the shop. I would check customer reviews. The installer can do a shitty job with a good brand and a great installer can do a great job with a shitty brand. Im much more concerned with the look of the tint more so then its actual function. So I would go with the cheapest place with the best review. 350 seems way too high to me

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dex Collaborator

Dex

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I don't think brand matters as much as the shop. I would check customer reviews. The installer can do a shitty job with a good brand and a great installer can do a great job with a shitty brand. Im much more concerned with the look of the tint more so then its actual function. So I would go with the cheapest place with the best review. 350 seems way too high to me

Most ceramic tints go between 300-600. Some even more.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ja Rhule Grand Master

Ja Rhule

Posted
Posted

Do you remember the brand, type and percentage you got? Pictures?

No, I don't. Sorry! Had no idea someone would ask for the info! I remember doing a lot of research online and reading racing forums. People on these forum take this poo serious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
Posted

Don't get a dyed metallic product that will fade. I've had 20% front and back on several cars now, paying around $200 at a shop here in Kansas, and I've never had any issues with fading (faded tint is a pet peeve of mine). Suntek or Viper seem to be common brands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dex Collaborator

Dex

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just curious. What is the point of ceramic?

Ceramic is non metallic so won't mess with my nav or radio signals and it also blocks out the most heat. They are the highest quality tints you can get. I plan on having this car for 7 years so it seems paying more is worth the investment. I also like to drive long distances and want to be comfortable in the car.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dex Collaborator

Dex

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Don't get a dyed metallic product that will fade. I've had 20% front and back on several cars now, paying around $200 at a shop here in Kansas, and I've never had any issues with fading (faded tint is a pet peeve of mine). Suntek or Viper seem to be common brands.

Yeah I'm shopping around for a ceramic tint. Different shops carry different brands so its a pain in the ass. I've heard good things about suntek I'll check out viper. Does yours have a matte look?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Batman Newbie

Batman

Posted
Posted

Ceramic is non metallic so won't mess with my nav or radio signals and it also blocks out the most heat. They are the highest quality tints you can get. I plan on having this car for 7 years so it seems paying more is worth the investment. I also like to drive long distances and want to be comfortable in the car.

A metallic film isn't gonna interfere with anything on your vehicle. The XM/FM antenna on the new Accord is located on the roof panel. The factory GPS antenna is located inside the front dash pad. Neither of those locations would be harmed by a metallic film.

Interference from metallic film occurs when the vehicle's antenna is surface glued to the rear window. And even then it's nothing extreme. Not many vehicles have those types of antennas anymore.

Ceramic is a superior film to metallic, but it's a waste of money in your application. You live in the NE, it doesn't even get hot there. Yes, ceramic will block more heat but you won't notice a difference unless it's in extreme temperatures. And you are going with an extremely light tint. 35% is almost not even worth bothering with tint. At that percentage the heat difference is even less noticeable.

The only thing you need to avoid is a dyed film because it will fade and crack over time. But none of the high end manufacturers or installers will even make or use that stuff so it's a moot point.

Llumar, Pinnacle, Global, 3M, etc; there are a lot of high quality film makers out there. It really doesn't matter, it's just personal preference. My current in-house tint pro uses Llumar, the guy before him used 3M. Never had a single issue with either product. And any reputable shop will stand behind their product and fix any issues that may occur.

I would also suggest doing a 5% strip across the top of your windshield to help reduce glare and reflections. Or you could even have the entire windshield done with a 70% film. Glass reflects light naturally and all vehicles have a certain amount of glare. When you tint your front windows it makes the glare worse because the light coming through your windshield is trapped and gets reflected back.

If you can get the ceramic for a comparable price go for it. But most shops will put a ridiculous markup on the ceramic vs metallic and try to market it as a vast superior product. That's how they make money. It's BS. It's a slightly better product, but it's not worth it if its a huge price difference.

Just make sure the shop uses a high quality brand and offers a warranty. Then just go with the best price you can find, don't waste your money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mr. Scot
      First 4 NFL starts - Tyler Shough

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      Has anybody actually said anything of that sort? (if they did, I missed it) I get why some folks rely on stats. I don't, and honestly I'm not sure why people keep trying to convince me I should. (it ain't gonna happen) 😕 Consistency is my big thing too, and the lack of it is why I want to move on from Bryce. But again, that's an argument I make without denying that he can indeed play in (and yes, win) NFL games. Hating bad QB play is fine. Denying when you see good QB play is silly. Let's be real for a second... This may not be you specifically, but there are some folks for whom Bryce can do absolutely nothing to win their approval. Some are always gonna want a bigger / stronger / faster / more athletic (in some cases, Newtonesque) quarterback even if Bryce does start to play consistently. At that point, they'll just shift the argument from "we can't win with Bryce" to "well, we can't keep winning with Bryce" 😖 You know all this as well as I do. So again, I want to move on from Bryce as well. I'd happily (hell, merrily) keep him as a backup, but I doubt there's a realistic path to that happening. But no matter what, I'm gonna keep my debate points based in reality, and I'm not gonna be responsive to "he just sucks" level persuasion. Is any of that unreasonable? 🤔
    • CRA
      First 4 NFL starts - Tyler Shough

      By CRA · Posted

      Apples and oranges.   No one is coming for Jon Snow and the neutral party when they compliment Bruce when it is just normal talk about a game.  Which is the literal picture you are trying to paint above.  I mean that’s exactly what you argued. if you start a thread that is about the future of the franchise at QB going forward at QB and what we should do or are thinking! Yeah, the anti Bryce crowd is going to very vocal on that thread because the literal topic is extending Bryce and the future at QB (which is what an anti Bryce position is literally about.  Moving on.  The future) This thread? I literally called out people in their feelings wanting to make this about Bryce and their hurt feelings eroding over.  You can find where I literally calls them out go make another Bryce thread if they didn’t want to talk Saints and the most relevant thing about them.  And the thread went exactly as we all knew it would.   Bryce deserved player of the week talk for Atlanta.  I have always acknowledged his great games.  A shame there are only two 
    • TLGPanthersFan
      Joe Person: Ickey is expected to be extended, Mays is someone we want to keep long term, TE, LB and OLB are our biggest needs heading into the offseason

      By TLGPanthersFan · Posted

      Then the offense will be the same up and down underperforming offense they are this year and our FO are filled with idiots.
×
×
  • Create New...