Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thomas Davis high on Shaq Thompson, calls Shaq "a better athlete than was," proud to be compared to Shaq


gettlemanjack

Recommended Posts

because of how athletic Luke and TD are, we only use 2 LBs and 5 DBs. Roman Harper acts as our 3rd LB. And Shaq is much more athletic

 

He did play safety for one game ... thought it was only in high school.

 

If you are talking about nickel coverage, Luke and TD are the LBs and I don't see that changing.  The third LB would be replaced by a CB.  In dime coverage, Luke will be the only LB on the field. 

 

Sean is a capable DC and will find a place for him.  If nothing else, Shaq increases our speed and sideline - sideline coverage.  Should be a big upgrade covering RBs out of the backfield when in the base defense. 

 

Going to say a prayer tonight that some offensive tools fall into our lap tomorrow (OT&WR).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are talking about nickel coverage, Luke and TD are the LBs and I don't see that changing. The third LB would be replaced by a CB.

our defense is a nickel D. Two LBs, two safeties, three CBs. Roman Harper acts as the "3rd LB," giving us 3 guys in the box (Luke, TD, Harper), backed up by 4 DBs (1 FS, 3 CBs)

"a majority of the season, the Panthers decided to work out of the nickel formation which meant the defense only had two linebackers on the field (Kuechly and Davis)"

http://car.scout.com/story/1504152-panthers-final-report-card-linebackers

look at the snap counts for our players on D, you will see the same thing

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/snapcounts

also, their was an article where one of our LBs other than Luke and TD was saying how he never gets to see the field because we only use 2 LBs. I searched for it but can't find it atm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was, and last year was worse because A) We made a quality, appropriate 1st round pick B) You didn't think the team would be stupid enough to bank on the same bottom feeding FA talent two years in a row as we did this year

How is making a quality first round pick worse? I'm not understanding what you are saying but at the same time I'm drunk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ask me in five years whether this draft class was good or not. Having said that, I'll grade the 2019 draft... R1 P16: Brian Burns - I'll argue this was a good pick. At the minimum, he was worth enough to have gotten a seriously good offer of picks which, in retrospect, we should've taken. But we still got something for him and his new team gave him a ton of money. R2 P37: Greg Little - Utter and complete flop. Only real value was somehow getting a 7th rounder from the Dolphins. R3 R100: Will Grier  - Played godawful the rare times he was on the field. Somehow still in the league. R4 P115: Christian Miller - Nothing of note. R5 P154: Jordan Scarlett - I don't think he even lasted two years. R6 P212: Dennis Daley - Some flashes of promise but we eventually traded him for some picks. Was terrible in Tennessee. I'll consider this a success since we got picks back. R7 P237: Terry Godwin - Did not last here long at all.  In summary, we got one quality starter... who is now gone. Daley might've been the second best player of this class and he was a middling backup at best. Burns saved this class from being a complete disaster.  D+
    • You can add that to the assessment of the whole offseason, but not the draft itself
    • If you're going to bring up the Burns trade you have to include the players we were able to sign with the money we saved by trading Burns.  We got three positions of need with the money we saved by trading him. 
×
×
  • Create New...