Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Boone DT


N1kkadeemuz

Recommended Posts

there were no available options until now.

they were looking but no one is going to be getting rid of DTs until time for cut down the rosters.

last year they had time. they went into the offseason with a plan to get bigger on the line.

this year they had something happen that couldn't have been expected all that much. your big NT goes down you don't find those guys lying around all over the place. you don'[t even see DTs lying around those guys are at a premium much more than OGs.

kemo's achilles is what screwed us.

if you think they should have prepared better, probably but they had other places to shore up as well. no NT or DT that was going to be available where we were picking was going to be starting anyway. they fixed what the could with the best available options and hoped that the areas that didn't get addressed would be fine until they could get a good solution there as well.

if they had addressed DT or tried to get a big NT (which would have cost a whole lot more than we could have afforded thanks to fat albert) then something else would have been broken and everyone would be whining about how they screwed the pooch with that one.

something is going to break. you do the best you can to prepare for each potential break but you can't fix everything that isn't broken yet. there was no reason to think that kemo was going to go down.

we needed a DE in case we couldn't get peppers back. (brown)

we needed help at DT (corvey irvin to replace an old damione lewis and we also got several big UDFAs)

we needed depth on the OL. (robinson)

we needed help in the secondary, esp. at CB. (martin and munnerlynn)

we needed someone to help in case we lost an aging hoover. (in case you haven't noticed FB is vital to the running game here).(fiammetta)

we needed better options for returners after losing mark jones (munnerlynn and goodson)

we needed another option for jake to throw to (goodson, remember they first talked to him about playing slot receiver)

the offseason didn't play out like they expected. oh well.

you deal with the hand that is dealt you. that is what they did and what they are doing.

Going into this off-season I guarantee you almost every single poster on this forum knew we were way to thin at DT. When Kemo was out last year we were destroyed on the ground.

I saw the writing on the wall when they slapped the tag on pep an how it would derail my hopes at getting quality depth like Brenard and Canty. I was one of the few who was willing to take just about whatever was being offered for Pep if nothing more then to get his salary off the books.

But as soon as Kemo went down we should have cut a few Salley type players and signed the best run-stuffer or two available. If nothing else it brings in quality competition to the guys who we already had. Which in hindsight they were just dumb to expect a guy who had actually lost 15 pounds in the off-season to try and replace a 350 lbs monster.

This could have been avoided if the FO had just done things differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lewis

Leonard

Boone

Favorite

Hayden

Irvin

Assuming we sign Boone, I wonder who the odd man (or two men) will be out. I'm assuming Favorite will be the first to be cut of the new core six and then Hayden. Then they'll go with Lewis/Leonard/Boone/Irvin.

I wouldn't be completely shocked if Corvey Irvin doesn't make the team though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lewis

Leonard

Boone

Favorite

Hayden

Irvin

Assuming we sign Boone, I wonder who the odd man (or two men) will be out. I'm assuming Favorite will be the first to be cut of the new core six and then Hayden. Then they'll go with Lewis/Leonard/Boone/Irvin.

I wouldn't be completely shocked if Corvey Irvin doesn't make the team though.

why would we cut a guy we just drafted

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going into this off-season I guarantee you almost every single poster on this forum knew we were way to thin at DT. When Kemo was out last year we were destroyed on the ground.

I saw the writing on the wall when they slapped the tag on pep an how it would derail my hopes at getting quality depth like Brenard and Canty. I was one of the few who was willing to take just about whatever was being offered for Pep if nothing more then to get his salary off the books.

But as soon as Kemo went down we should have cut a few Salley type players and signed the best run-stuffer or two available. If nothing else it brings in quality competition to the guys who we already had. Which in hindsight they were just dumb to expect a guy who had actually lost 15 pounds in the off-season to try and replace a 350 lbs monster.

This could have been avoided if the FO had just done things differently.

being thin at DT was no secret. here is the problem...do you look at replacing the older DT or the bigger one....or get the best available option?

i'm not going to talk about the pep situation. the team didn't screw us. the situation did. they weren't going to let him go so complaining about that is futile.

when kemo went down, there were no big DTs available. teams stock up on those guys like crazy because they are so rare. if you have a big guy on a roster and there is even a sliver of a chance that he could be worth a roster spot you don't let him go until you are forced to.

the first opportunity we were going to have at a DT that was worth a roster spot was when the first round of cuts came.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30 Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
    • He isn't a good HC. I think he has proved that conclusively.
    • The missed tackle percentage is on that screen cap.
×
×
  • Create New...