Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Atlanta Falcan'ts were paid $1 million to 'honor' the military


tiger7_88

Recommended Posts

http://newstome.blog.ajc.com/2015/05/11/falcons-paid-1-million-to-honor-military-hometown-heroes/

 

Until today I was under the impression sports teams honored military personnel due to patriotism or some sense of community spirit.

But then I read an article that says taxpayers shelled out $5.4 million to 14 NFL teams to honor mostly National Guard troops

The Falcons were paid more than $1 million, the highest of any NFL team. I will try to get confirmation from the Falcons today, and ask the Braves if they operate under a similar deal.

 

 

 

The Falcons were paid $1,049,500 between 2011 and 2014, according to data on NJ.com. The largest payments were made prior to each season.

Here’s what the 14 NFL teams were allegedly paid.

  • Atlanta Falcons – $1,049,500
  • Baltimore Ravens – $799,000
  • Buffalo Bills – $679,000
  • Indianapolis Colts – $620,000
  • Minnesota Vikings – $605,000
  • Green Bay Packers – $600,000
  • New York Jets — $377,000
  • Kansas City Chiefs – $250,000
  • Cincinnati Bengals – $139,000
  • Dallas Cowboys – $62,000
  • St. Louis Rams – $60,000
  • Pittsburgh Steelers – $36,000
  • Cleveland Browns – $22,000
  • Miami Dolphins – $20,000

When it comes to winning public dollars, the Falcons are tough to beat.

 

 

 

Arty Blank is a greasy weasel, I swear.

 

Thank goodness for JR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So a (until now) tax exempt industry that has been falling over the 100's of millions it has made tax free, hands out a measly 1 million over 3 years to a rival team, and its an issue?

 

Who cares! They are handing out money not to teams,but to our troops through proxy. When it comes to our soldiers, I dont give a damn about rivalry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So a (until now) tax exempt industry that has been falling over the 100's of millions it has made tax free, hands out a measly 1 million over 3 years to a rival team, and its an issue?

 

Who cares! They are handing out money not to teams,but to our troops through proxy. When it comes to our soldiers, I dont give a damn about rivalry.

 

You know the individual teams have always been taxed, right?

 

Just checking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know the individual teams have always been taxed, right?

 

Just checking.

 

And you do know, that any NFL owner is sitting on tons of money, so putting some out a measly 1 million (over three years) to our troops is really no big deal (and a tax write off)...right?

 

Just checking.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's largely based on advertising. I've been in the Army for 20 years and there is a ton of money that is spent for the Army to advertise. They sponsor a NASCAR car. So to pay a team to honor some soldiers so people see soldiers being honored is part of a recruiting budget somewhere. I'm not surprised. I'm surprised that all 32 teams aren't on the list though.

But I could be wrong and it could be shady. I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you do know, that any NFL owner is sitting on tons of money, so putting some out a measly 1 million (over three years) to our troops is really no big deal (and a tax write off)...right?

 

Just checking.

 

You understand that the Falcons were paid $1M+ not that they paid that money out, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...