Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wrist watches


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

Men are serious about their watches. Some of my coworkers have 10-20 watches. Others have 1-2 watches that cost few thousands. Every time we have a meeting, you just see dudes checking out each other watches. It rubs off on me, I just purchased my 3rd watch in 3 months. I got around 7 watches now and my wife hates it. Anyone in the same boat?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I might look into it, I might use it for fishing.

Best deal i found on it was at Sam's. I had been drooling over it for a few months but couldn't justify the $300 on Amazon. It was $180 at Sam's. It comes with a manual that could knock someone out if you throw it at them. It also adjusts your time for dst automatically from the watch people in fort Collins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean I'm 19. I have more important purchases to make right now than a damn watch lol. I'll make it there in a few years, cause I am all about some style

Oh yea, I start buying watches when I turned 25. When I was 19, watch was the last thing on my mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...