Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NBA Finals Thread


Recommended Posts

I kinda hope it goes 7 games just because I have an opportunity to go to game 1, then I'm in NYC for a week, then I have an opportunity to go to game 7. But if we sweep I won't cry or anything. 

​In 1988 I had tics to Game 6 and Game 7 of the World Series.

Doh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Warriors will crush them honestly. The Cavs have not looked good at all this postseason, they've just been playing interior teams. Watching Cleveland in crunch time reminds me of watching us, only with a better player with the ball (he still does idiotic things though).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Montsta ballin

Actually it's funny I split season tix with a buddy of mine for the Warriors and the face value isn't all that bad. My finals seats are $250/game (x2 seats) and they charge you in advance for all possible games (x4). 

I could put them on SH for $750 each and they'd sell in 5 minutes. But I'm gonna be in NYC on 6/6-6/14 so I can't go. So I might go to game one on 6/4, my buddy would then go to game 2, I'll watch the @Cleveland games from NYC, and then we'll see what happens from there. 

If they sweep and have a parade on the Saturday I fly back and I miss it though I'll lose my poo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are so incredibly wrong. But it's okay, you were what 10 years old Curry's first few seasons?

Curry played almost every game in 3 years at Davidson. He only missed 10 games total his first 2 NBA seasons, and another 10 games total over his last 3 seasons. He missed 40 games his 3rd season with a broken ankle. Hell, Michael Jordan missed 64 games his 2nd season with a broken ankle. 

Curry has never had injury issues. He's always been a very durable player. He had one bad injury and missed time 1 year out of 9 years total.

Irving has missed 56 games in 4 seasons with various minor injuries. Irving has never had a major injury like Curry, yet he's still missed the same number of games in 2 fewer seasons. Irving also missed nearly 30 games in his only season at Duke. 

He also had injury issues in high school. The dude is injury prone and never healthy. He's also going to be abused by Curry in the Finals.

His foot stayed getting hurt early in his nba career
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought this time off would be good to go through my DVR and watch some movies i recorded and/or watch something other than NBA playoffs... the movies sucked, TV sucks, what will we do after the Finals?? :(

It's definitely the worst time of the year. You just have to suck it up until football starts again.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Darnold is basically a really high level game manager. Put him on a good team where he isn't required to provide lift and he can shine. But when you need him to do the franchise QB thing and put the team in his back here comes the INTs. He just doesn't seem to have any positions on his dial between "super conservative take whatever's there and take care of the ball" and "YOLO!!! There's a receiver down there somewhere in that sea of defenders!"
    • See, it's posts like this that show me how many of you are taking my post as an anti Dowdle post and saying he didn't have a good game, but that's the furthest thing from my intention and what I'm trying to say. Because that's the comparison you're making with Bryce, it's adding or removing a small handful of plays from their stats and saying "this is the game they could have had instead" I'm literally only talking about the play calling from the game, it's literally in the title of the thread, that we still have play calling problems. I'm saying that people are going to get stuck on the 200 yard rushing game by a player and extrapolate that to "well Canales must have called a good game" and I'm trying to say not to fall for that mirage. Because 6 big runs do not make for a well called game when we had over 60 snaps. Even beyond that, if you add in the two 20+ yard catches from T-Mac and the one XL had, and you're looking at 9 of over 60 snaps that accounted for close to 60% of our yards in the game. That's a few big plays covering up for coaching deficiencies, that's NOT a well called 60 minutes of football. Had he had the 200 yards because Canales' play calling was keeping the defense on their heels, not knowing what we were doing next, and Dowdle was ripping of 8-12 yard runs on a consistent basis, then yea, that would be something to be excited about with Canales finally calling a good game for a change. Our offense is predictable and the play design is basic, there is nothing I've seen out of Canales' offense that says he's able to scheme and call plays to outsmart the defense, which is something all the elite offensive coaches are able to do in this day and age.
    • Dante Moore is the top pick in a couple of mock drafts now. 
×
×
  • Create New...