Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Phil Jackson: Duke Players Fail To Live Up To Expectations In The NBA


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

HAHAHAHA.  Then he fuged up with Miles and Mason too.  Typical bandwagon Duke fan.  

I'm a Tarheel, smart guy- hence the mix-up Miles and Mason and bad recollection of players.

I just figured I'd give some recent players that are in the league and rattle a few opinions off the top of my head. And yeah, I only remember Seth playing at Duke for like a year. I am seriously floored right now that you guys say he was a senior, that's crazy. Did he see the floor much as a freshman or sophomore?? No wonder I had ZERO expectations for him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a Tarheel, smart guy- hence the mix-up Miles and Mason and bad recollection of players.

I just figured I'd give some recent players that are in the league and rattle a few opinions off the top of my head. And yeah, I only remember Seth playing at Duke for like a year. I am seriously floored right now that you guys say he was a senior, that's crazy. Did he see the floor much as a freshman or sophomore?? No wonder I had ZERO expectations for him...

At Liberty he averaged 20 ppg, that's where he was.  Then he transferred to Duke for his Junior season (had to sit out a year).  And the rest is well mediocrity in my opinion.  To be honest, I think Coach K might of ruined him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phil is just stating the obvious. Grant Hill is the only star that has come out of Duke under Coach K.

Irving has a chance to be the second, but he's got to stay healthy long-term and right now that looks debatable.

If you don't count guys like Elton Brand and Carlos Boozer as stars, don't count guys like Vince Carter and Ty Lawson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vince Carter was a million times better then Brand and Boozer ever were. Those guys were good players, but Vince was a superstar.

Don't be stupid.

You should follow your own advice. Take RG3's career, spread it out for a decade and you have Carter. He was a superstar for two, maybe three years. Most fans probably don't even know he's still in the league. 

Not the least bit surprised this thread turned into a UNC circle jerk. At least half of you have to have posters of Jerry Stackhouse over your ceilings at night to give you some spank bank material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should follow your own advice. Take RG3's career, spread it out for a decade and you have Carter. He was a superstar for two, maybe three years. Most fans probably don't even know he's still in the league. 

Not the least bit surprised this thread turned into a UNC circle jerk. At least half of you have to have posters of Jerry Stackhouse over your ceilings at night to give you some spank bank material.

Nope. But I do have a signed Julius Peppers, Harrison Barnes, and Lawrence Taylor UNC jerseys hanging up in my apartment. In frames, if that counts.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are an obvious Duke troll.

Vince Carter will be in the Naismith Hall of Fame. Additionally, Vince Carter is/was better than Grant Hill or any other Duke player in the NBA.

Vince was the NBA Rookie of the Year in '99, averaging 18/6/3. He followed his rookie season with 10 consecutive seasons of 20+ ppg, including 8 consecutive All-Star games.

first 11 seasons:

50% fg, 23.5 pt, 5.5 reb, 4.3 ast

17 year career:

44% fg, 19.4 pt, 4.8 reb, 3.6 ast

Vince was a superstar for over a decade. Carter's first decade was also better than those 5 or 6 seasons Grant Hill had at his peak before his injuries. In reality Grant Hill is the one who only had 2 or 3 seasons at a legit superstar level. Duke fans have vastly overplayed his skill with the "what if" hypotheticals and act as if he was on pace to be better than Michael freaking Jordan. Grant Hill had 2 or 3 years at a star level, so have hundreds of other players.

I don't know how but even Jamal Magaloire was an All-Star one year.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vince Carter is/was better than Grant Hill or any other Duke player in the NBA.

 

You know what I like about you? I don't even have to say anything to point out your stupidity and blatant UNC bias. I can just highlight some of your sentences and let the idiocy speak for itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...