Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Packers fans loved Tyrell Sutton

CrossnoreP

By CrossnoreP,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CharlotteBeer.com Newbie

CharlotteBeer.com

Posted
Posted

I think he sounds like a good pickup considering we claimed him off waivers, but I just wonder what the front office has up their sleeves. I mean, with Goodson looking stellar as our third running back with two fullbacks also on the roster, I can't help but question this pick when we desperately need players on the d- and o-lines.

It makes me think we'll be hearing those two dreaded letters for Stewart this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chaos Veteran

Chaos

Posted
Posted

If Williams and Stewart are Double Trouble and Williams/Stewart/Goodson are Smash Dash and Slash, what do you call the force that is DeAngelo Williams/Jonathan Stewart/Mike Goodson/Tyrell Sutton?

A force known as DeStew Goodsutton. Watch out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CharlotteBeer.com Newbie

CharlotteBeer.com

Posted
Posted

I was thinking about it, and it wouldn't be absurd to carry this number of backs, even if Stewart is able to play come week one.

Goodson could technically take the fifth receiver spot, leaving Sutton as our third running back.

This is the same logic I used to convince myself we could keep Goodson and Lee (before I saw Lee play in the preseason, of course). Green Bay's UDFA running back certainly proved superior to ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vagrant Explorer

Vagrant

Posted
Posted

Smash, Dash, Slash, and Trash. LMAO.

Kidding. I am willing to give this guy a shot. He seems better suited for catching out of the backfield. He has some really nice hands and his best asset seems to be his ability to follow his blocking schemes. He doesn't appear to be overly elusive or strong. He just seems to be about average in both.

Best of luck to the young man, but I doubt he gets a lot of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • kungfoodude
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • tukafan21
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...