Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

J Leman signed with the Eagles, Favorite may as well


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Do you think this stuff can really give an opposing team an advantage

Yes,

It can give some insight but since they weren't likely part of specific game-planning against the Eagles it isn't likely to give much more advantage over film study I would think. But since we are the first game of the year for the Eagles it is likely that this pickup is to aid them in planning against us imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

won't need any signals to beat the panthers D. just get the ball to the receivers and exploit the panthers secondary.

panthers front 7 is decent and will look better than it has during the preseason but that secondary is going to be kind of porous.

best chance that the panthers defense is going to have is to take advantage of the weak, hurt, and overrated philly Oline. get to mcnabby and use the LBs to shut down westbrook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

won't need any signals to beat the panthers D. just get the ball to the receivers and exploit the panthers secondary.

panthers front 7 is decent and will look better than it has during the preseason but that secondary is going to be kind of porous.

best chance that the panthers defense is going to have is to take advantage of the weak, hurt, and overrated philly Oline. get to mcnabby and use the LBs to shut down westbrook.

They won't "need" signals to beat the defense, but it will sure make their jobs a lot easier. The Patriots didn't "need" to secretly film the Jets' practicing or whatever, but that sure made their jobs a lot easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both of these guys are defensive players, so they're not going to help Philly prepare for our offense at all. But with that said, we have 20 of 22 starters returning, so it's not like there's a lack of game film out there.

I think the big thing Philly will want to know is how similar our new defensive packages are to the ones they ran in Indy. Fox sure didn't show anything in the preseason games to prepare with, and everyone knows the defense they saw will be different than the one that shows up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both of these guys are defensive players, so they're not going to help Philly prepare for our offense at all. But with that said, we have 20 of 22 starters returning, so it's not like there's a lack of game film out there.

I think the big thing Philly will want to know is how similar our new defensive packages are to the ones they ran in Indy. Fox sure didn't show anything in the preseason games to prepare with, and everyone knows the defense they saw will be different than the one that shows up.

Now that's just crazy talk. Have you seen what Gman has to say about that? You know he's always right!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep, like I said, I don't mind guaranteeing them money, but make the contracts smaller amounts in order to minimize cap implications. I don't know about "half," the actual amounts, whether more or less than half, would have to be determined by the NFL and NFLPA (which will probably be highly contentious, if not "impossible").  I'm just for whatever leads to the best product on the field while also unaffecting my wallet. As an aside, the NFL owners are greedy bastards in my estimation. They're trying to keep a larger portion of the pie, but players' agents are greedy as well, and they've sewn seeds of greed among the players. It's not all their fault; we all know what our society has evolved into, but the NFL wants a bigger piece of our smaller pocketbooks and refuses to "negotiate" with us (that's why we don't have cheaper and more reasonable à la carte options to view games that they're gradually trying to migrate to paid TV), so fu<k 'em. And then on top of that we have guys trying to water down the product even more by feeding greed. Change the way things are done so that we can at least see players prove themselves on the field without throwing wrenches into the engine that pays guys that have proven they can play on a pro level.
    • So if one of the parents wants to buy the theatre group or the band lunch they should get banned?
    • OK, I didn't realize this was about high school, but...if I'm spending my personal money trying to help some kids out, then no one is going to tell me how to spend my money. I get enough of the government spending my money--allocating my tax dollars--to children who don't really need anything, and now they're trying to tell me how to spend my personal money? Sure, there are many other issues to consider and rabbit holes that we could go down due to ethical concerns because it concerns kids, and the need for transparency is extremely important, but maybe as opposed to trying to stop kids from benefitting in darkness, we need to open up the blinds (and blinders) a little bit so that they can benefit in the light. I get where you're coming from, but this is a loaded and layered issue, and I'm just trying to give you some food for thought. 
×
×
  • Create New...