Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guess who's dropping passes and guess who's making it look easy


X-Clown on 1

Recommended Posts

Probably Webb. I love the guy, but Rivera's obsession is getting a little out of hand.

 

Webb plays special teams and can be backup WR. 

We don't need tons and tons of questionable WRs activated who do nothing but play WR badly.  We are a Shula offense.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having him be active would be a good start.

Now the question that follows: Who gets deactivated so he can play?

I'd say Philly, to be quite honest.

Probably Webb. I like the guy obviously, but Rivera's obsession is getting a little out of hand.

 

I'd doubt it for Webb, because he plays a big part in all phases of special teams.  I don't think Philly does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Webb plays special teams and can be backup WR. 

We don't need tons and tons of questionable WRs activated who do nothing but play WR badly.  We are a Shula offense.  

 

 

Just about all we have are questionable WR's. That's just the situation as it stands.

I'd say Philly, to be quite honest.

I'd doubt it for Webb, because he plays a big part in all phases of special teams.  I don't think Philly does.

If Philly isn't even activated, then we may as well drop him to the practice squad, and bring back up Bersin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably Webb. I like the guy obviously, but Rivera's obsession is getting a little out of hand.

Possible, but Webb plays special teams.

Brown "sort of" plays special teams.

I'm not really sure what happens there, honestly. 

I am fairly sure a lot of folks won't like whichever decision gets made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just about all we have are questionable WR's. That's just the situation as it stands.

If Philly isn't even activated, then we may as well drop him to the practice squad, and bring back up Bersin.

I have no problem with it myself.  I've always liked Philly, but having the best guy is far more important than who someone likes.

Also...

 

RR: Norwoord now “knows enough that he can help.” Sounds like a much better chance than last week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's see, we know Brockel will be out, along with D. Williams,  maybe Luke.  That would be 3 inactive.  I'm assuming Star will play at least some of the game.

I would think Wegher & Marlowe will again be inactive.  That would be 5.  Need two more.

I think Mayo will be ACTIVE if Luke is out.

Where to find two more guys to deactivate?  Norwood or Webb would likely have to be one.  I doubt both will be inactive.  I'm really not sure who else might not play...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possible, but Webb plays special teams.

Brown "sort of" plays special teams.

I'm not really sure what happens there, honestly. 

I am fairly sure a lot of folks won't like whichever decision gets made.

I know Webb plays special teams, and I'm not saying he shouldn't be activated, but all this about him playing WR is just showing how awful the situation is becoming.

I have no problem with it myself.  I've always liked Philly, but having the best guy is far more important than who someone likes.

Also...

 

RR: Norwoord now “knows enough that he can help.” Sounds like a much better chance than last week.

I want to see Norwood get a jersey Sunday. But unfortunately, I have doubts that Rivera will actually deactivate Brown, at least this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know Webb plays special teams, and I'm not saying he shouldn't be activated, but all this about him playing WR is just showing how awful the situation is becoming.

I want to see Norwood get a jersey Sunday. But unfortunately, I have doubts that Rivera will actually deactivate Brown, at least this week.

I think it's gonna be an interesting Sunday morning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biggest issue I see is Carolina refuses to let Cotchery handle punts if things get bad (we saw that last year, when they wouldn't even let him field a punt to ensure it was caught).

So that means, if Ron's eyes....if Ginn gets hurt we have no one to field punts.

That I would assume also keeps Philly activated in this scenario in regards to Norwood.  Which is a problem...b/c you SHOULD be deactivating a WR for Norwood.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biggest issue I see is Carolina refuses to let Cotchery handle punts if things get bad (we saw that last year, when they wouldn't even let him field a punt to ensure it was caught).

So that means, if Ron's eyes....if Ginn gets hurt we have no one to field punts.

That I would assume also keeps Philly activated in this scenario in regards to Norwood.  Which is a problem...b/c you SHOULD be deactivating a WR for Norwood.  

Is Fozzy only returning Kickoffs, or can he also return Punts?  I forget...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...