Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our defense...


stankowalski

Recommended Posts

Having Kuechly will help with a lot of that.  I saw a few plays today where it looked like Klein was either late getting in position or just not there at all.

Thats not good also when you LB has to constantly  cover the misake for other players. Defense needs to regroup after this game ASAP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats not good also when you LB has to constantly  cover the misake for other players. Defense needs to regroup after this game ASAP.

Klein didn't cover for anyone's mistakes...he was making his own.  Which was why I said that having Kuechly back in there will help out quite a bit.  Only thing that really worried me was the anemic pass rush.  But still we only allowed 16 points.  Could it have been better?  Absolutely, but I'm not panicking yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it was bad,tbh if luke doesn't try norman in the end who knows how this game would have ended,they were moving at will on offense, D line was getting pushed around all day, pass rush was non existent even with blitzes,they did a good job of picking them up, and the saints run game wasn't that bad either.

 

when you have as much draft picks and FA's invested in the defense they shouldn't perform like this consistently 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it was bad,tbh if luke doesn't try norman in the end who knows how this game would have ended,they were moving at will on offense, D line was getting pushed around all day, pass rush was non existent even with blitzes,they did a good job of picking them up, and the saints run game wasn't that bad either.

 

when you have as much draft picks and FA's invested in the defense they shouldn't perform like this consistently 

I don't know...top 5 is pretty good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No pass rush against a patchwork OL, poor tackling and too many open receivers. A doofus at QB was insanely efficiency and moved the ball at will. 

It was as bad as it looked and it needs to be fixed, now.

...I dont know why we make these total loozer QB's look worth a sht but we do...where were the exotic blitz's...where was the the heat?...pisses me off and if we are going to the next level we have to tweek that sht..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are going to get tired of me but w/e...it's the absence of Hardy...

Some people brushed his absence off like it wouldn't matter but yea it does....and we had a losing record last year for the "what about last season" folks....our DL sucks nuts when we have our DT lining up at DE to try to manufacture pressure.(KK)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
    • If hypothetically, Ickey comes fully healthy, would he be willing to give up left tackle money for left guard money? In the Panthers case, moving Ickey LG or RT would be in our best interest and as it gives us our best starting offensive lineman combination. However, Im sure there's another team that would be desperate and willing to dish out top dollars for Ickey to have him come play left tackle for them. In that case, Ickey would just leave for that team instead.
×
×
  • Create New...