Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

nfl.com article on josh norman


Keep Pounding

Recommended Posts

After watching that INT against NO, i think Ben (can't spell rest of name) wanted Norman to give the ball to him so he could give it to a fan. Obviously Norman didn't listen and Ben leaves a little upset. Anybody else noticed that? 

Bene explained in an interview later that he was worried that Norman wasn't touched down and he was about to give the ball back to the Saints because he thought the play was still going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if you're going to drop a lot of money, I believe CB is a position you would.  QB/LT/CB/elite pass rusher seem to be the big four.  

True, but of that list, we only have a QB.  I think DG holds the guys in the trenches, in a much higher regard, and would rather spend there.  I agree that CB is a position of high value, personally.  I'm just wondering if he does as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but a player can also bust for a lot of reasons.  And I'm not about to go look up the stats of all the 1st round WR busts, but I'd be surprised if they had the sustained output and success in college that T-Mac had.  Those early WR busts are usually guys who had one breakout season and then were highly drafted because of physical potential, not already built out ability. I'm not even saying T-Mac is 100% going to have a better career than Chark (although I obviously think he will). I'm just saying that right now, his skill level and ability is better than Chark's ever was, and I don't understand how anyone is arguing against that, not because of T-Mac, but because of who Chark himself was.   If you want to take the argument that you can't say ANY player who hasn't played a down yet can't be considered better than someone who has, then so be it (even though I'd say that's a dumb stance anyways). At his peak ability, Chark was more like a #3 WR than anything else, he was the definition of a league average WR.  If you don't think a Top 10 selected WR with his tape is better than that just because they haven't played in the NFL yet, then you're just stuck on the "he hasn't played a down yet" idea and can't evaluate them as players and abilities.
    • And you would've probably said the same thing about a lot of highly drafted WRs who busted.
    • dude..........   You are way to emotional here
×
×
  • Create New...