Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some interesting stats on Luck


Verge

Recommended Posts

Stats when playing inside his division:

18 tds, 8 turnovers

 

Stats when playing outside his division:

36 touchdowns, 24 turnovers

 

Stats when playing a team with a winning record (At the end of the year in 2014 and now in 2015):

19 touchdowns, 15 turnovers

 

So, take that as you will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, Luck is a good QB on a struggling team.  He's having a poor season so far, but Indy is dangerous and Luck can turn it on at any moment.

I don't think Indy can play at the same level as this Panthers team this year.  Our defense is playing at a very high level.  Our offense is designed to capitalize on the success of this defense.

If Luck is looking for a D he can carve up and recover his season against, this is not that defense.  KK, Davis, Kuechly, Norman and Co. will force him into mistakes and his stats will probably not look any better after Monday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, some of you guys forget all too quickly that we are still the Panthers, and can lay an egg at any moment.  (like almost every NFL team)

 

Anyway, teams that can score in bunches scare me, and Indy can score in bunches...maybe not this year as easily as most, but they can.  We are playing well, and are scoring points, but I don't like us in any "shootout" type games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....
    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
×
×
  • Create New...