Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So if MN loses tonight we don't clinch 1st rnd bye?


Lilsmitty09

Recommended Posts

If we are 12-4 and the Packers are 12-4 we have the head-to-head tie breaker over them. However, if Arizona winds up 12-4 then they are ahead because they would win the conference matchup tie-break. As far as my understanding, we don't have to worry about any of this poo if we win out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jesse said:

If we are 12-4 and the Packers are 12-4 we have the head-to-head tie breaker over them. However, if Arizona winds up 12-4 then they are ahead because they would win the conference matchup tie-break. As far as my understanding, we don't have to worry about any of this poo if we win out.

I am not worried either but there are 2 first round byes. I am just so confused right now..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lilsmitty09 said:

I am not worried either but there are 2 first round byes. I am just so confused right now..

Yeah these tie-breaking scenarios have literally thousands of different possibilities. So I just try not to worry about it and root for the Panthers. The past years I've focused on our future draft picks, a year or two later focus on our playoff-clenching scenarios. Now it's about  who we'll play and beat in the playoffs. It's a great year to be a Panthers fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Lilsmitty09 said:

I am not worried either but there are 2 first round byes. I am just so confused right now..

Three way ties are broken differently than two way ties. Head to head isnt used unless one team has beaten both of the other teams. 

The only way we don't get a bye now, even if we lose out, is to have the cardinals and packers both win out and finish 12-4. Then we lose three way conference record  tiebreaker. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nice.  Allar is intriguing.  He's a medical red flag.  I'm not sure when he would be available.  However, we aren't moving off Bryce at least until '27, so he'd have time.  I'd be shocked if Young is not our starting QB next year.The OL needs some reinforcement, I agree . Moton's contract is a beast as well as the guards we signed in FA.  Corbett is hurt all the time and BC is nice depth, but a mediocre starter.  Defense is a must.  You hit some critical areas--Edge, LB, CB.  I would like to see another safety as well.
    • I don’t know how people could not see it. I am no draft scout and never claimed to be.  It is a situation where when you look at him, what does he have physically that is better than NFL average? Nothing that I could see.  Not foot speed. Not arm strength.  Then you look at his size and it is well below all but Murray in my memory for the modern NFL era.  Murray has the plus athleticism/quickness and a plus  arm. I still wouldn’t want him because of his size.   But Bryce had none of that to offset his size.  So okay now that I have assessed Bryce I don’t want him. It was a simple checklist. Except I see all this talk that they might take him. So now I decide I need to look at him closer.  Pro day video… I see what I called a skip step. A little extra move on the deep pass. I look at the velocity of his throws, NFL average is being kind. I look at that footwork and it is big time wonky.  So there you are, lower ball velocity in my opinion   That adds time in a league where guys are timed down to the 100th of a second. Not a plus. It is questionable. Then the extra move on the deep balls which is time, in the face of pressure, and space, also in the face of pressure…  it is a stack of negatives and the guy had nothing athletically to offset it. And it is the 1.1 of the NFL draft where there has  never been a successful player with his attributes at his position, in the modern era.  In his case you don’t have to be a super scout. You just had to look and think about him in relationship to the NFL game.    I never watched him in college and think that prevented me from rationalizing things. I had no bias in that regard and I believe others might have.    Combine that with a personal opinion that the SEC is not the NFL and there was no automatic approval  because of the level of competition level he faced….    On that front I feel there are single digit examples of guys who truly could be in the NFL in their final year of college. The freaks. The rest of them… take what they were their fist NFL camp and give the a season in the league and an offseason with the resources and standards of NFL conditioning and strength programs and compare them to a year before… you will see a difference. And they aren’t finished growing either so that plays into it.  It is was a bunch of factors that just equaled do not do this. It gets a lot harder if he had the size to measure up to these normal prospects with the prototypical physiques, and the cannon arm, etc. I never could claim to be good at eyeballing comparisons between two players like that.   Bryce was such a unique situation. Anyway that was the process.   Looking at guys that people compared him to was also informative, since Brees was the big one. And if you honestly look at Brees and his size, people comparing the two like they are 1 to 1, it was smoke. I am always suspicious of smoke blowing, when I find it.  Saying I was not special I just used my brain and eyes and they are not special either. So I had a very hard time understanding what people were thinking. 
×
×
  • Create New...