Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seahawks 1-7 all time in temps less than 28 degrees


cardiackat88.

Recommended Posts

Source: http://www.foxsports.com/north/story/minnesota-vikings-seattle-seahawks-could-cold-freeze-out-temperatures-010516

Very interesting....

"

The Seattle Seahawks have traditionally not done well in freezing temperatures. Advantage, Minnesota Vikings?

According to the National Weather Service, the high in Minneapolis for Sunday's NFC wild-card game is 1. Wait, scratch that. It's a high near 1.

Needless to say, Seattle has never played in a game that cold in its franchise history. In fact, Seattle has hosted a game just once below freezing (a 31-degree game on Dec. 21, 2008).

The Seahawks are 1-7 in games played in which the temperature is less than 28 degrees."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, cardiackat88. said:

Source: http://www.foxsports.com/north/story/minnesota-vikings-seattle-seahawks-could-cold-freeze-out-temperatures-010516

Very interesting....

"

The Seattle Seahawks have traditionally not done well in freezing temperatures. Advantage, Minnesota Vikings?

According to the National Weather Service, the high in Minneapolis for Sunday's NFC wild-card game is 1. Wait, scratch that. It's a high near 1.

Needless to say, Seattle has never played in a game that cold in its franchise history. In fact, Seattle has hosted a game just once below freezing (a 31-degree game on Dec. 21, 2008).

The Seahawks are 1-7 in games played in which the temperature is less than 28 degrees."

Doesnt matter if Vikings defense and passing game doesnt show up. They have a good chance of winning long as they stay aggresive on offense and allow Birdgwater to do more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 15 said:

Mother of god I have never seen a fan base so scared of another team before. Every thread in this forum is about why Minnesota can pull off the upset so we don't have to play Seattle. Man the fug up you guys are straight up embarrassing...

Were only talking about the team that has gone to the Super Bowl the last two years, back to back. Nothing to worry about I suppose...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Barry McCaulkinor

Because a team with players who didn't win in 1992 somehow has an effect on a team playing in 2016? We could maybe make a connection if it was the same players in a more recent year, but to go back to 1992 is just dumb imho. 

This is why using stats as your only basis for anything is a joke. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lately on the Huddle:

OMG look at how obsessed the Seahawks are with us!!!

OMG look at what the Seahawks said about Cam

Minnesota is going to beat the Seahawks...

Look at the Seahawks message board..

Cam is better than Russell Wilson

Seattle's fan base is all bandwagon fans.

I think Russell Wilson's water is mixed with Viagra and sweat from Ciarra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) the dumb Russell Wilson water jokes have reached Cam laptop territory and are stupid and unoriginal now

 

2) I'm so tired of seeing little panther bandwagon fans soil their briches about Seattle because merril hoge or whomever told them to. 

 

I hope we play Seattle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It will be really interesting to see how both sides handle this. I'm sure the team would love to get him signed to a 4 year deal based on his output so far and some potential factored in, i.e. something like a 4 year $30 million contract.  But I could see his agent telling him the best path is to take the one year offer, put up a big year next year and then really cash in. The team also has to keep in mind T-Mac's 2nd contract, which likely will happen after the 2027 season assuming he keeps improving as expected.  Even if we could get him on a budget 4 year deal for what he could become, the problem then becomes when he wants to re-negotiate in 2 years during the same summer we will extend T-Mac, and you don't want to spend that much on WRs in one offseason, just see the Bengals this last year. Taking everything into consideration, I'm thinking the 1 year deal and then getting him to sign a 4-5 year deal after hopefully say a 800ish yard season next year might be best for our cap situation and separate his and T-Mac's negotiation periods.
    • And yet jax made it no further than we did, and its very possible the Pats don't either. I think it speaks more to the overall down year for the nfl as far as having great/dominant teams, every team this year has fatal flaws that can be exploited 
    • Ehhh I agree the nfc is stronger this year but their really werent any truly dominant teams this year everyone is flawed, I think the narrative for the NFL this year will to try ahd force a Josh Allen SB win
×
×
  • Create New...