Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

AFC Wild Card games thread

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

FootballMaestro Newbie

FootballMaestro

Posted
Posted

Love how everybody keeps making a big deal about playing in the rain during the Cincy vs Pittsburgh game.

The irony being: No one in the national media knows or even remembers-if they did know- that Newton played in about 3-4 monsoons earlier this season-when discussing his passing stats, and the negative effect those games had on them (along with receiver drops, and slowing down the offense with big leads) .

Apparently, Cam gets no mulligans from certain members in the media?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pox 08 Newbie

Pox 08

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Swan said:

Why are people talking about Seattle? Haven't even beat the Vikings yet; even the media is overlooking Minnesota. Stop with that bs until they actually win pls.

 

I'm with ya,   I'm thinking "Any given Sunday",   but I can understand why so many are overlooking the Vikings.   Bridgewater has 17 total TDs in 16 games.    He seems to really strain when he tosses the ball down the field and even his shorter passes don't seem to have a lot of zip on them.   It's easy to write him off against the Seahawks defense.   If the Seahawks just have to pull everyone closer to the line,  and stop AP,  while also stopping those little dinks and dunks..   I don't see how the Vikings win.    I'm of the belief of "Any Given Sunday",  but I can't picture it in my head,  the Vikings winning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ECHornet
      Known Prospect Meetings with Panthers

      By ECHornet · Posted

      Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • LinvilleGorge
      Tight End: The Need is Bigger than We Think

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • strato
      Known Prospect Meetings with Panthers

      By strato · Posted

      Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...