Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Seahawks Fans Are Saying - Playoff Edition


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, WeAre12 said:

Did you even watch the game? Their "march" down the field was aided by 36 yds in penalties including a call against Chancellor that the Seahawks protested to the NFL head office. As for the missed FG, Sherman missed blocking the last one by one inch. Sherman was directly in the kicker's field of view and he psyched him.

So now you are taking credit for the missed FG because Sherman ALMOST blocked it. 

We have seen our share of brain dead fugtards on this board as we play Atlanta and NO twice a year.  But Junior, you truly take the cake.  You were either dropped on your head repeatedly as a child....or, you were just born fuging stupid because of a very shallow gene pool.  Which is it?  We are just dying to know.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WeAre12 said:

Did you even watch the game? Their "march" down the field was aided by 36 yds in penalties including a call against Chancellor that the Seahawks protested to the NFL head office. As for the missed FG, Sherman missed blocking the last one by one inch. Sherman was directly in the kicker's field of view and he psyched him.

Yes.  Seattle flat out got lucky to advance.  Simple and plain.  It happens in sport.....if you can't acknowledge that then you can't talk sports.

PI is PI....and it came on the one thing that has hurt Seattle all year when they have lost.  Trying to cover a TE.  They went right back to it and he made another play on Kam.  It is called a weakness of Seattles. Then the Vikings missed a chip shot 99% made gimme.  

Seattles two best plays were a missed 99% made chip shot by Minny and a botched snap that went back 10 yards and Seattle needed the breakdown of a botched play to help them actually go score.  You got as lucky as lucky can get.  You aren't the first and won't be the last to win a game you shouldn't have.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, MadHatter said:

So now you are taking credit for the missed FG because Sherman ALMOST blocked it. 

We have seen our share of brain dead fugtards on this board as we play Atlanta and NO twice a year.  But Junior, you truly take the cake.  You were either dropped on your head repeatedly as a child....or, you were just born fuging stupid because of a very shallow gene pool.  Which is it?  We are just dying to know.

No, he is taking credit b/c he almost blocked a different kick.  You know what every team almost does in almost every game

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This article was a feature article on bleacher report today which tells you all you need to know..

The reasons given along with the comments on why they can beat us shows how far they are reaching to show why they will win..

http://www.hawkblogger.com/2016/01/10-things-to-keep-in-mind-about.html

 

 

Edited by SportsCrazie4172
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, SportsCrazie4172 said:

This article was a feature article on bleacher report today which tells you all you need to know..

The reasons given along with the comments on why they can beat us shows how far they are reaching to show why they will win..

http://www.hawkblogger.com/2016/01/10-things-to-keep-in-mind-about.html

 

 

lol...Bleacher Report.  Counter to the statements.

1.  Seattle is 0-1 since the departure of Dan Quinn.  Quinn has stopped Cam in Seattle and with Atlanta.   Seattle without him hasn't beaten Cam and now has weaknesses in their armor that have shown all season.  LOB never had that with Quinn,mono weakness ...which is why they could and did adopt the LOB nickname.  With the way they consistently been beaten late in games I am not sure how they keep the LOB tag.

2.  Carolina went 15-1, by that sheer fact it impacts the the potential of opponents that could have winning records.  If they would have lost there games then 7 teams they played would have had winning records.  Fuzzy logic.

3.  Yes, Seattle was missing players and had injured guys.  So?  It is the NFL.  We have played games without Kelvin, Luke Kuechly, Kalil, Stewart, Tillman, Bene, Ginn, Cotchery, Etc.....and went 15-1.  

4.  Again, Irvin has sacked Cam but living in the Dan Quinn era is sad.  also, Cam flat out takes sack.  Part of how he has to play to make his plays.  

5.  Yes, Carey Williams is gone.....yet last Sunday in the 4th Q the Vikings marched down the field and exposed the same issue that has plagued Seattle since the start of the season.

6.  Yes, Carolina is down two CBs that played last game.  So?  See #3.  No excuses.  

7.  Correct, Carolina didn't force a turnover vs. Seattle and that was the only game they failed to do so.  They still won.  On the road.  What was the point you were making?

8. Okay, and again, Carolina still won.  They still won and that was before Cam started rolling.  

9. again, we still we still won.  I mean the the author keeps thinking that suggesting we beat Seattle yet didn't do X means something.  Seattle would needed to of won that game for this points to hold weight.

10.  And one again, Seattle lost.  So again, all the "points" are made as if Seattle actually won.  Since they didn't....they aren't points.  It just throws Seattle into the mix of literally every single opponent....we beat them all ( we had a loss, but still beat them)

in 2015 Carolina has shown to be the better team.  Doesn't mean they win this weekend.   They have to remain that and no reason to think they won't 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, WeAre12 said:

You guys are in for a serious wake-up call. You don't tug on Superman's cape, You don't piss into the wind.......https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fancy-stats/wp/2016/01/12/the-seahawks-are-a-nightmare-matchup-for-the-panthers-heres-why/

 

No you don't tug on Superman's cape you little assswipe.  But, the problem for you and the Seahawks is that Superman plays for the Panthers and is getting ready to kick your dog....fug your gf (oh wait he has already done that to RW's woman)...and beat the living hell out of the team that you cluelessly cheer for.

Edited by MadHatter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

I can't believe this dudes syatements. If they were the ones 15-1 I would understand, but they aren't . By the way this dude is talking they are 16-0

Your record doesn't mean jack, you've played a whopping 4 teams with winning records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t think people are saying that picking up the option s a call for the pitchforks. We would have had to do things differently a couple of years back to make declining the option a valid move. We didn’t and here we are. People largely accept that. The patter it adheres to, reinforces the nausea we feel when the idea of an extension, and at top of the market no less, comes up.  One that he hasn’t shown he deserves.   Same as he did not deserve to be drafted 1.1. Look at Pavia and what really is the difference? Bryce is a nice guy and Pavia is an asshole lol. They are both no margin for error non day one talents. One went undrafted.  
    • We hate losing. I don't know Bryce to hate him. His play as a QB, I absolutely hate. It's just not good enough. If there were a lottery held to select the order and all 32 starting QBs could be drafted as the starting QB for whatever team selected them, how long do you think it would be before Bryce's name was called? Top 10, top 20, bottom 8? Think about it.  For me, having never seen back to back games with franchise QB level performance in 3 years tells me what I need to know. We still need to be looking for our solution at QB.     
    • Dude, I'm saying the Cardinals have proven they know nothing. Not saying keeping Bryce is the best choice long term, just saying that we've made the right move for this moment in time.  But man, the Cardinals are never a blueprint for success. Haven't been since they were in Chicago.
×
×
  • Create New...