Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What You Want To Bet....


DevilCat

Recommended Posts

That there has been a "Players Only" meeting at BoA if not for the whole team but surely in certain areas ( Offfense/Defense). If we go into the Crow's nest Sunday and pull out a win, I'm sure sometime later on we will hear about this from one our local "award winning" :rolleyes: journalist. Of course the doom and gloom crowd will say things like "so what meetings can't save this team, blah,blah,blah...we suck...blah,blah,blah". I'm not saying it's going to or has happened, but contrary to all the chicken littles out there some of these guys care about what they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless in that meeting they discuss how they are going to ignore Fox and Richardson's lame playcalling and do there own planning/calls for the game.....the meeting won't be THAT effective.

Great talent and heart can be put in a position for failure.....we have seen that the last two games. They (imo) realize that.....one wanted out inbetween those two games and we bashed him for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless in that meeting they discuss how they are going to ignore Fox and Richardson's lame playcalling and do there own planning/calls for the game.....the meeting won't be THAT effective.

Great talent and heart can be put in a position for failure.....we have seen that the last two games. They (imo) realize that.....one wanted out inbetween those two games and we bashed him for it.

Eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless in that meeting they discuss how they are going to ignore Fox and Richardson's lame playcalling and do there own planning/calls for the game.....the meeting won't be THAT effective.

Great talent and heart can be put in a position for failure.....we have seen that the last two games. They (imo) realize that.....one wanted out inbetween those two games and we bashed him for it.

:confused::confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry. Davidson. Fox and Davidson's lame playcalling. Tiger Woods makes typos also, cut me some slack. I have a million negative thoughts going on from THE Richardson down to the waterboy. You knew exactly what I was saying. Fox and Davidson's playcalling is the biggest problem the past two weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry. Davidson. Fox and Davidson's lame playcalling. Tiger Woods makes typos also, cut me some slack. I have a million negative thoughts going on from THE Richardson down to the waterboy. You knew exactly what I was saying. Fox and Davidson's playcalling is the biggest problem the past two weeks.

HAHAHA

Its cool man, Federer does too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still in a state of shock that what we witnessed Sunday was after our coach's game planning? Really, that's the best they could do? They didn't expect different blitz schemes and plan for them??

Nobody ever told them that you could stand a DE up in the middle like a MLB and let him rush the QB. If they had known it could be done they would have tried it with Peppers so he wouldn't get held by the OT every play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not saying it shouldn't be a part of his game it should be present yes. But expecting 500/10 in the rushing category is not sustainable IMO. All it's going to take is a defender to be willing to sacrifice a penalty or a fine to send a message just as the Falcons did with Sam Darnold. And even as big and durable as Cam was defenses eventually started to try to send a message to him too. We have to be realistic about not putting our QB at unnecessary risk. Especially given the fact we aren't even willing to run a QB sneak with him. We've also invested a good bit in our backfield that's what they're there for. And furthermore ultimately whatever QB  tier Bryce Young ends up landing in over the course of his career it is going to be defined by what he does as a passer not his rushing ability. That's all I'm saying.
    • Bryce had 191 yards 55% completion 1 td 1 pick.  That's an amazing performance?   Come on people
    • His footwork has been discussed many times over related to not just within the pocket but the quality of his drop backs and how while his receivers have been an issue his own footwork has created issues with his receivers. It is a mutual give and take dynamic after all. As far as his deep passing goes I will happily admit I saw some very impressive long throws from Bryce later in the season and I said so at the time and I'm still saying so now. That doesn't mean that there still aren't issues and beyond some instances of him flat out missing receivers deep that he knows he needs to get corrected I think there are still some throws to the sideline that defenses are going to test Bryce on early and often and until he can prove he can beat defenses on those throws consistently they will play him the same way. As far as talk of Bryce being top ten and the metrics that define that different people are going to have different answers and I've said before after the conclusion of the 2024 season that I'm going to try to put yardage aside in some cases and just focus on what Bryce is doing both between the 20's moving the ball and how our redzone scoring percentage is looking. The biggest thing I'm looking for this season is scoring points. Not just field goals. Touchdowns. If the offense is moving consistently and reaching the end zone more often than not and not squandering drives and settling for field goals then I am going to be content for the time being. I do not expect miracles this season. I expect development and competiveness on both sides of the ball but particularly the offensive given the investments we've made trending upward. And no blowout losses. I don't think that's an unreasonable ask do you agree? 🫡
×
×
  • Create New...