Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ted Ginn an X-Factor?


cpipster49

Recommended Posts

We can't overlook the fact that Ted Ginn was an Arizona Cardinal last year. He didn't see much time on the feel or have many passes thrown his way, but he was in the film room with the three-headed beast our secondary is tasked with stopping on Sunday.

Another note about Ginn: He was targeted just once against the Seahawks and his only yards were 11 rushing yards on an end around. We jumped out to such a big lead early we never had to run plays that take advantage of Ginn's speed. We know he is healthy or else Philly Brown or Brenton Bersin would have been returning our punts.

Since we know the Cardinals coaches don't think much of him to begin with, combined with the fact that he won't show up much in the game film from Sunday, he may not be a point of emphasis and a place we can attack the Cardinals if their secondary doesn't play him they way he needs to be played. But he still needs to catch the ball!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, cpipster49 said:

We can't overlook the fact that Ted Ginn was an Arizona Cardinal last year. He didn't see much time on the feel or have many passes thrown his way, but he was in the film room with the three-headed beast our secondary is tasked with stopping on Sunday.

Another note about Ginn: He was targeted just once against the Seahawks and his only yards were 11 rushing yards on an end around. We jumped out to such a big lead early we never had to run plays that take advantage of Ginn's speed. We know he is healthy or else Philly Brown or Brenton Bersin would have been returning our punts.

Since we know the Cardinals coaches don't think much of him to begin with, combined with the fact that he won't show up much in the game film from Sunday, he may not be a point of emphasis and a place we can attack the Cardinals if their secondary doesn't play him they way he needs to be played. But he still needs to catch the ball!

Based off the Seattle game, Cardinals may be more prepared for the run.

Though we bitched and moaned. It's true. The Panthers really didn't show much of their passing attack Sunday, and this may/should bode well for them, especially playing at home and with Ginn maybe wanting to prove something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, FootballMaestro said:

Based off the Seattle game, Cardinals may be more prepared for the run.

Though we bitched and moaned. It's true. The Panthers really didn't show much of their passing attack Sunday, and this may/should bode well for them, especially playing at home and with Ginn maybe wanting to prove something?

I think the coaches were scared. Cam's not stupid but he's got plenty of gun slinger passes each game. Doing that against Sherman and Thomas is playing with fire. I think they wanted to avoid a pick at all costs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Donald LaFell said:

I think the coaches were scared. Cam's not stupid but he's got plenty of gun slinger passes each game. Doing that against Sherman and Thomas is playing with fire. I think they wanted to avoid a pick at all costs. 

Especially with a big lead!

Obviously, the Panthers did the opposite when down in Seattle earlier in the season.

Should be an interesting game.

Hopefully (another, or complete) Panther blow out!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Jonathan Stewart is the X-Factor.  I hope he pounds the ball 20+ times on Sunday.  The Packers ran pretty 'easily' against the Cardinals which is surprising because the Packers don't have a great running game.  

I think the Panthers need to run, and run, and run more to win this game.  This will take time off the clock & keep the ball out of Palmer's hands.....we don't need him to have lots of time to throw to Fitzgerald, Brown, and Floyd as those guys present some match-up problems for our injured secondary.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...