Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why the Cardinals Lost


ncmonzta

Recommended Posts

Just watching NFL network and heard an analyst say Bruce Arians said the team lost a little of their fire because they were ready to come out of the gates, but security made them go to the locker room and wait an extra five minutes due to the AFC game still going. He also said Palmer may have still been having issues with the splinter in his finger, but he's not making any excuses. 

 

#gategate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally!  Now it all makes sense!  Meanwhile the Panthers probably got to start the game on time, therefore not losing any of our fire!  Not to mention the actual fire from the pregame introductions and the roaring crowd.  It really is unfair to Arizona that they let us play in our home stadium because of what I can only assume was a random coin toss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ncmonzta said:

Just watching NFL network and heard an analyst say Bruce Arians said the team lost a little of their fire because they were ready to come out of the gates, but security made them go to the locker room and wait an extra five minutes due to the AFC game still going. He also said Palmer may have still been having issues with the splinter in his finger, but he's not making any excuses. 

 

#gategate

Yea, right!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arians is a fugging bitch.

Anyone else catch what he said right after halftime?

Apparently he told Erin Andrews that the Panthers were the worst 2nd half team in all of football and if the Cardinals get off to a fast 3rd quarter start, they'll win for sure.

This coming from a team that got fugging owned in the first half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cary Kollins said:

Arians is a fugging bitch.

Anyone else catch what he said right after halftime?

Apparently he told Erin Andrews that the Panthers were the worst 2nd half team in all of football and if the Cardinals get off to a fast 3rd quarter start, they'll win for sure.

This coming from a team that got fugging owned in the first half.

did he actually say that? in the interview?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...