Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Broncos Fans Are Saying

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

BrownianMotion Newbie

BrownianMotion

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, 15 said:

"if the panthers win the superbowl, it wont count because there were a lot of injuries in the nfl this year. the panthers are the only team without any" -tarheels

LOL! Did he actually say that? Denver had the fewest man games lost to injury this year by far. Denver has been the luckiest team in terms of injuries in 2015.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mikencP226 Newbie

mikencP226

Posted
Posted

I finally found ONE reasonable Broncos fan (from their board):

" I think we can beat the Panthers. I think we can beat the Panthers. I think it's more likely that we will not beat the Panthers.

Sure, i'd slap down $10 on the Broncos to win, but if someone were to force me to bet a couple hundred, it'd go on Carolina. Carolina is the more complete team right now, and there's no debating that. It's just fact and common sense goes to the complete team, not the one dimensional. 

As previously stated, though, I believe we CAN beat them. "

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swaiy Newbie

Swaiy

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, BrownianMotion said:

LOL! Did he actually say that? Denver had the fewest man games lost to injury this year by far. Denver has been the luckiest team in terms of injuries in 2015.

You're such a bitter Pats fan.  If this was said about Brady & Co. you'd be clamoring about only being able to play the teams on your schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrownianMotion Newbie

BrownianMotion

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Swaiy said:

You're such a bitter Pats fan.  If this was said about Brady & Co. you'd be clamoring about only being able to play the teams on your schedule.

I don't need to make excuses or be bitter about anything. Here's why:

15c4d0996ab2e5cd55c31ae6ece7255a.jpg

Now, back to the discussion at hand, your team has indeed had the fewest man games lost to injury. That's a fact. So what the other Broncos fan claimed was completely fabricated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cyclonus Newbie

Cyclonus

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, BrownianMotion said:

I don't need to make excuses or be bitter about anything. Here's why:

15c4d0996ab2e5cd55c31ae6ece7255a.jpg

Now, back to the discussion at hand, your team has indeed had the fewest man games lost to injury. That's a fact. So what the other Broncos fan claimed was completely fabricated. 

Oh look.  It's the I'm losing an argument so I'll talk about my teams past accomplishments move.  I'd be more impressed if you could tell me who Steve Grogan is without using Google.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrownianMotion Newbie

BrownianMotion

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Cyclonus said:

Oh look.  It's the I'm losing an argument so I'll talk about my teams past accomplishments move.  I'd be more impressed if you could tell me who Steve Grogan is without using Google.

I didn't lose anything. A Broncos fan claimed that the Panthers were the only team in the league who had no (or very minor) injuries. I corrected his false claim by pointing out that the Broncos were actually the luckiest team in the league when it comes to injuries, as they have had the fewest man games lost to injury in the NFL this season.

Source: https://www.mangameslost.com/nfl-regular-season-end-games-missed-due-to-injury-january-4-2016/ (you may require a premium account)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swaiy Newbie

Swaiy

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, BrownianMotion said:

I don't need to make excuses or be bitter about anything. Here's why:

15c4d0996ab2e5cd55c31ae6ece7255a.jpg

Now, back to the discussion at hand, your team has indeed had the fewest man games lost to injury. That's a fact. So what the other Broncos fan claimed was completely fabricated. 

If he is even a Broncos fan... might just be a fan of another team the Panthers beat.  With that said, so what if they played against teams with injury? Thats pretty much all of the NFL.

I cant wait for the actual game to get here because the hypotheticals and stats discussed here mean nothing at the end of the day. Kind of like the picture of trophies you posted in regards to THIS year. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrownianMotion Newbie

BrownianMotion

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Swaiy said:

If he is even a Broncos fan... might just be a fan of another team the Panthers beat.  With that said, so what if they played against teams with injury? Thats pretty much all of the NFL.

I cant wait for the actual game to get here because the hypotheticals and stats discussed here mean nothing at the end of the day. Kind of like the picture of trophies you posted in regards to THIS year. :)

Trophies may not mean anything this year in terms of who wins or loses, I agree. But they mean something to the fans of the team, and winning one recently makes a playoff loss a whole lot easier to deal with.

For example, with the Broncos not having one in 17 years, I imagine it would be incredibly difficult to deal with another loss (especially after the 43-8 debacle.) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
caatfan Newbie

caatfan

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, BrownianMotion said:

For example, with the Broncos not having one in 17 years, I imagine it would be incredibly difficult to deal with another loss (especially after the 43-8 debacle.) 

True, but 14 teams (including the Panthers of course) have never won a Super Bowl, and 4 (Cleveland, Jacksonville, Detroit, and Houston) have never made it to the big game. So I can't work up much sympathy for Denver fans even if they get clobbered again on Sunday (and I certainly hope we kick their butts worse than Seattle did).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cat Newbie

Cat

Posted
Posted

Listening to mile high radio, in general they don't have much respect respect for any aspect of our team but Cam. Most seem to think J Stew isn't much of a worry, nor our receivers. And they think their offense can handle our D and put up lots of points. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Cat said:

Listening to mile high radio, in general they don't have much respect respect for any aspect of our team but Cam. Most seem to think J Stew isn't much of a worry, nor our receivers. And they think their offense can handle our D and put up lots of points. 

As we have said before.....thin air and smoking pot is HELL on intelligent thought.  They are proving it.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • countryboi
      Brooks RB, Placed on PUP, Out for 2025

      By countryboi · Posted

      You joke, but it can always be worse. He might walk with a limp or need assistance. Different sport, but Lonzo Ball couldn't even walk up steps a year after his injury.
    • Icege
      Brooks RB, Placed on PUP, Out for 2025

      By Icege · Posted

      I mean... a lot of the information that could've helped set better expectations has always been out there: There was no RB on the team under contract for the 2025 - 2026 season except for Miles Sanders. The team did not have a second round pick going into the 2025 season due to the trade for Young. Chuba's extension did not happen until the beginning of November. Jonathon Brooks was the clear RB1 in the class with a massive gap between RB1 & RB2. Example: Dane Brugler had Brooks as RB1, overall #48; Blake Corum was RB2, #81 overall. The Giants held pick #47 and had just lost Saquon Barkley to the Eagles in free agency. They were going to take Brooks had the Panthers not jumped in front of them. So if we're framing things with that context: Chuba was expected to be RB1 Miles (at the time) was RB2 Brooks was essentially RB3, stashed for rehab in 2024 with a long runway. The original injury occurred Nov 2023 while the re-injury occurred December 2024. That is right in the high-risk window for recurrence, especially in explosive athletes. The fact that it also happened on a non-contact play suggests possible biomechanical issues such as muscle imbalance, rather than a failed surgery (or bad decision-making).   NFL teams invest heavily in medically vetting prospects. If there had been a clear red flag in imaging or recovery markers, the team is going to find it. This sucks and the Panthers have sucked, yes, but this wasn't blind optimism or malpractice by the front office. It was a calculated decision based on the roster, draft capital, positional scarcity, etc.
    • Navy_football
      Clowney released

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Yep, but they can all rotate with Brown, Brown and Robinson (sounds like a law firm). Can't continue to have Derrick Brown out there for 90+ percent of the defensive snaps. An injury was bound to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...