Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

House of Cards Season 4


Jangler

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Jangler said:

Half way thru e2 and FU still hasn't talked to people, it's almost like now that he's president, he's ignoring us..  

He had that nice soliloquy in the second or third episode while making the PB&J sandwich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love it, let's goto War!

I thought they would have made it through the election this season. A lot of stuff happened it what seemed like a short amount of time. 

I liked how they didn't end with a cliff hanger. How many seasons does HOC have left? 2? 3? Still some of the best writing out there, doesn't leave you hanging like I know Walking Dead will do (like they always do). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The number of times and the ways in which they were able to wriggle out of trouble this season got a little ridiculous. They've gone from a political thriller/drama to a political soap opera.  Each crisis they get into is resolved illogically by the following episode and a new one is introduced, all to keep the viewer moving on to the next episode. I miss the slower burn of the first two seasons.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Irony yes you could say that as long as there is no intent to claim that because he left we all of a sudden got so bad we are losing all the time. Which it seems like you might be trying to imply.  Did we lose something? Yes we did. Was it worth 5 years at 28 mil per? Not to my thinking.   
    • https://www.facebook.com/MEMES.of.the.NFL/videos/779983564773360/ LOL 
    • First: What do you think the word ‘scapegoating’ means? Because what I said was not scapegoating.  They are two different players playing two different roles.  I simply said two things about Burns, if I recall. One, basically he is a one dimensional player that is doing well because they have a very strong front in NY.  Two, I was against paying his price because he is a liability against the run. One dimensional and therefore not worth it.  Summing it up: he e is a pass rush specialist, about all I have ever felt about him, and his financial demands made him much less of a value.  IMO. 
×
×
  • Create New...