We Threw Hardy Under the Bus, but We Just Drafted A Guy With the Same Red Flag

[Fox007]

4 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

So this is the kind of thing that is appropriate for your moderators to say, @Jeremy Igo?

This guy is one of your MODERATORS?

Eh I got banned a long time ago for neg repping a mod....he posted a derogatory comment on another poster....got banned with a message like "lol do you know who you neg repped"

Not much goes into it I assure you.

 

[Datawire]

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Impossible to prove.

So according to the law as written, you agree with me after all.

[LinvilleGorge]

1 minute ago, Datawire said:

So according to the law as written, you agree with me after all.

I was talking strictly about his motivation to enter a no contest plea.

If you plead no contest you'll be e a conviction on your record. 

[Datawire]

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I was talking strictly about his motivation to enter a no contest plea.

Motivation isn't a crime unless proven by a court backed up by evidence. That is hearsay counselor.

[Icebox]

25 minutes ago, Datawire said:

Don't agree with that at all according to the letter of the law. A no contest plea cannot be used as evidence against a defendant.

Look, I am an attorney. Three years of law school and ten years of practice.

When you plead no contest, you are accepting the consequenes of a guilty verdict. It works like this: The judge accepts your plea of no contest. Then the judge enters a verdict of guilty.

I don't quite understand what you are arguing, but you clearly don't understand how it works. Worley was found guilty. And, by the way, it most certainly can be used as evidence against the defendant under Rule 609 if he were to testify.

[LinvilleGorge]

Just now, Icebox said:

Look, I am an attorney. Three years of law school and ten years of practice.

When you plead no contest, you are accepting the consequenes of a guilty verdict. It works like this: The judge accepts your plea of no contest. Then the judge enters a verdict of guilty.

I don't quite understand what you are arguing, but you clearly don't understand how it works. Worley was found guilty. And, by the way, it most certainly can be used as evidence against the defendant under Rule 609 if he were to testify.

Thank you.

[Datawire]

1 minute ago, Icebox said:

Look, I am an attorney. Three years of law school and ten years of practice.

When you plead no contest, you are accepting the consequenes of a guilty verdict. It works like this: The judge accepts your plea of no contest. Then the judge enters a verdict of guilty.

I don't quite understand what you are arguing, but you clearly don't understand how it works. Worley was found guilty. And, by the way, it most certainly can be used as evidence against the defendant under Rule 609 if he were to testify.

What state do you practice?

[pantherj]

The Panthers were perfectly happy to allow Hardy to play until media coverage became extreme. The media coverage was almost on the level of the Kennedy assassination, and something had to be done. Local white knights were calling the Panthers offices to yell at the secretaries about how upset they were that Hardy was still on the team. The moronic tribal "protect the WOMEN' frenzy hit a peak that I don't think we've ever seen in the history of sports. Stupid people are easily manipulated by the media, and most people are stupid. Hardy had to be sidelined, and eventually cut.

Right now the masses and media could care less about our new draft pick shoving a woman, so Gettleman and RR sure as poo don't care. Now that can change if the media goes into another feeding frenzy.

 

[tiger7_88]

1 minute ago, pantherj said:

The Panthers were perfectly happy to allow Hardy to play until media coverage became extreme. The media coverage was almost on the level of the Kennedy assassination, and something had to be done. Local white knights were calling the Panthers offices to yell at the secretaries about how upset they were that Hardy was still on the team. The moronic tribal "protect the WOMEN' frenzy hit a peak that I don't think we've ever seen in the history of sports. Stupid people are easily manipulated by the media, and most people are stupid. Hardy had to be sidelined, and eventually cut.

Right now the masses and media could care less about our new draft pick shoving a woman, so Gettleman and RR sure as poo don't care. Now that can change if the media goes into another feeding frenzy.

 

[beastson]

I went to nfl.com to see who we drafted and I go to his draft profile and the first comment I read is

likes to beat up women in clubs.

then i come on here and read this

[Icebox]

I practice in North Carolina. Mostly criminal law.

Look, I accept that people make mistakes. I'm willing to give the guy a second chance. However, I do agree that Hardy's situation doesn't seem nearly as bad. 

 

[Kuhndog94]

14 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

/thread

 

 

they still dont get it...

[firefox1234]

26 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

Personally I would have went with the whole "my sister, mother, daughter wouldn't be assaulting someone else" route.

Or in Hardy's case...."my female whatever wouldn't be coked up in some doods house attacking him and breaking poo".

 

Your sense of humor has me amused.

[Datawire]

5 minutes ago, Icebox said:

I practice in North Carolina. Mostly criminal law.

Look, I accept that people make mistakes. I'm willing to give the guy a second chance. However, I do agree that Hardy's situation doesn't seem nearly as bad. 

 

Ah thanks. 

This took place in Morgantown, West Va. Either way, carry on.