Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sign Anquan Boldin

uscgamecocks

By uscgamecocks,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

uscgamecocks Newbie

uscgamecocks

Posted
Posted

Don't care what it takes, get it done.  We need a reliable threat out of the slot and he provides that in spades.  He's also the reigning NFL man of the year.  Getting KB back and adding Boldin will provide the offense with all of the help it needs to repeat as top 5 group.

If we make this signing, I can live with spending an entire draft on defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
uscgamecocks Newbie

uscgamecocks

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, thomas96 said:

I'd be for it, but there are other priorities. Would have to come pretty cheap.

What other priorities do we have?  We can't possibly sign another defensive back.  We are full up at DT.  DE doesn't seem to be a priority based on this draft.  And I'm sure we are going to draft an LB in the 7th, because we always draft a LB.

We have > $20m of cap space.  KK is going to get extended, that's certain, but that won't eat up much of this year's cap.  Star will be extended next offseason.  Maybe I'm missing something, but I think we could easily pay Bolding $4-5mm for one to two years with zero cap concerns.  We cut Norman to spend money somewhere...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, uscgamecocks said:

What other priorities do we have?  We can't possibly sign another defensive back.  We are full up at DT.  DE doesn't seem to be a priority based on this draft.  And I'm sure we are going to draft an LB in the 7th, because we always draft a LB.

We have > $20m of cap space.  KK is going to get extended, that's certain, but that won't eat up much of this year's cap.  Star will be extended next offseason.  Maybe I'm missing something, but I think we could easily pay Bolding $4-5mm for one to two years with zero cap concerns.  We cut Norman to spend money somewhere...

Extending guys like KK, Norwell, Kalil, Philly, etc. And we still need safety help, none of the 3 guys we drafted will play safety. DE is a priority over wideout as is OT competition I'd bet. I'm all for it but it'd have to be less than $3M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
uscgamecocks Newbie

uscgamecocks

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, thomas96 said:

Extending guys like KK, Norwell, Kalil, Philly, etc. And we still need safety help, none of the 3 guys we drafted will play safety. DE is a priority over wideout as is OT competition I'd bet. I'm all for it but it'd have to be less than $3M.

Good point on Norwell - they may well extend him this year.  I don't think Philly will be extended right now, but I know some here really like him.  He's improved each year, so if he makes another leap he might turn into a long-term asset.  If anything, Kalil's cap hold is going to come down in future years with an extension as he's getting up there in age.

I'm with you on adding OT and DE depth / help - I just don't know who is out there that we can sign at this point.  But I think Boldin would easily put up 750yrd / 6 TDs in our offense and would pick up tons of clutch first downs.

We have $32mm of cap space right now - I think we can definitely make him fit, whether its $3mm or $5mm.  It wouldn't be a long term deal but it would provide immediate impact.  Think our biggest concern is maintaining flexibility in future years to resign our core.  Will be interesting to see - we're gonna spend it somehow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Navy_football
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Roger all that. Do you think BY avoided any sacks last game? This oline is not what you're touting them to be. They are much better then 2023! Much much much better than 2023. But come on now, you'd expect this expensive oline (most are run blocking specialist) to at least dominate in the run game every game.  And... I keep telling you our WRs and TEs are not that good yet. I mean last Sunday was a prime example. Our receiving targets never make plays like those. Never. And this is from one of the worst teams in the league. Shough could have easily had 3 INTs if not for his receivers making plays on the ball. Our guys just don't do that. XL almost allowed an INT backing up out of bounds instead of coming to the ball. And everyone would have blamed that on BY. That's why he doesn't throw to that dude. I can't recall a game except maybe the second Falcons game - maybe, where I thought our receivers could possibly be better than the other team's. I think TMac and Coker have a lot of potential. But they're aren't consistent. But they're young and WILL improve. I'm confident of that.  I don't agree that BY was drafted to only stand in the pocket. He has always been best off schedule - for better or worse. 
    • ForJimmy
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Do you think you will get a direct answer?  Icky giving up 5 pressures (playing hurt in his defense) by himself and Bryce only getting sacked once tells you he played well in the pocket.  He extended plays and converted some tough downs.  
    • frankw
      What gets this team past this?

      By frankw · Posted

      I've been very apprehensive about potentially firing yet another head coach. But Canales needs to focus on being a head coach first and foremost and begin handing off some responsibilities like playcalling duties and begin overseeing the entire team or we need to assess all possible ideal HC candidates in the offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...