Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

new Radiohead new Radiohead new Radiohead

davos

By davos,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Zaximus Grand Master

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

I miss the old Radiohead, with the booming guitars.   I kept waiting for it on that new song.  It's not bad, but, I miss it.

Actually I really like it, on 2nd/3rd listen but I still keep waiting for some nice guitars lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

I miss the old Radiohead, with the booming guitars.   I kept waiting for it on that new song.  It's not bad, but, I miss it.

Actually I really like it, on 2nd/3rd listen but I still keep waiting for some nice guitars lol.

You've gotta factor in they're probably leading people into the new album.  This is the most anticipated I've been since In Rainbows.  I think this will be back towards an IR/Hail to the Thief type aesthetic which I'm quite interested in.  

Ready for a lush Ed O'Brien solo to come firing in haha. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stankowalski Newbie

stankowalski

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, 15 said:

"waaaahhh, their new stuff doesn't sound anything like their radio hits from 20 years ago!"

FYI, Thom Yorke hates the majority of songs you just posted. They are radio singles that made them famous, but that's not what Yorke is about. Their music evolves with time and anything they touch is gold. Thom Yorke does not want to be on the radio anymore, he writes music that he enjoys while pushing new boundaries. It's about story telling, expression and beautiful music. 

Nobody gives a poo about what boundaries he wants to push.  That new song is awful and no amount of elitist douchebaggery will persuade me otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stankowalski Newbie

stankowalski

Posted
Posted
On 5/5/2016 at 9:38 PM, TANTRIC-NINJA said:

He likes Seether...bc Shinedown can be a bit too edgy....

 

I like a wide variety of stuff from just about every genre you could think of...being edgy has nothing to do with anything unless you're 12 years old.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bronn Contributor

Bronn

Posted
Posted

 

Radiohead always sounded like a newer Pink Floyd that was about to, at any moment, break out into a heavy rock part but never really did.

They got famous from their singles, but never really wanted to keep doing them. It comes off as highly pretentious, and somewhat arrogant tbqh.

Obviously they are good at what they do, and set the stage for more modern acts that are of the similar vein, but I just never really got it. It just comes across as emotionless or soulless...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bronn Contributor

Bronn

Posted
Posted

never fear, huddlers, Musical Elitist is here...

The second song is a perfect example of what I was talking about before... It is a cinematic build up track that never climaxes. This first song was actually likable... but the second one just reeks of "I'm not a musician I am an artist revel in my art" pretentiousness...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rodeo Grand Master

rodeo

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, 15 said:

Now I remember why I don't talk about music with huddlers.

It's the same with most things, really. If you love anything from music, to movies, to tv shows, most of the Huddle will be shitting on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...