Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Remember when everyone was angry that the Panthers cut WR Jarrett Boykin last year....


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, top dawg said:

Full of poo until the end I see.  Your problem is that you can't or just won't acknowledge that someone can have a different opinion than yours---and yes, that's what t is: opinion---fully supported by valid rationale, that is neither wrong nor right.  In the end, you can't prove that my opinion is wrong, no matter how bad you desire to, and your calling me to task is built upon nothing but your own fabrication.  That's the great thing about the written word and archives, they can always be used as a reference and evidence to the truth.

How can I prove you wrong via a hypothetical scenario that will never happen?

We cut him. He isn't coming back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/25/2016 at 9:55 AM, TheRed said:

How can I prove you wrong via a hypothetical scenario that will never happen?

We cut him. He isn't coming back.

The guy is only interested in showing all the huddlers how much more he knows than you. After the the years of whacked out comments he's made on this particular subject, you would think that he would watch more games.

 

Shrug, maybe he cant see the game cuz he's too Top Top.

 

Anyways now that you've questioned Dog's superior knowledge, I look forward to the 20 news article threads he's gonna post this week to make up for being insecure.

Awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/25/2016 at 6:55 AM, TheRed said:

How can I prove you wrong via a hypothetical scenario that will never happen?

We cut him. He isn't coming back.

Boykin would have won the Super Bowl from the practice squad!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Razeyfingers said:

The guy is only interested in showing all the huddlers how much more he knows than you. After the the years of whacked out comments he's made on this particular subject, you would think that he would watch more games.

 

Shrug, maybe he cant see the game cuz he's too Top Top.

 

Anyways now that you've questioned Dog's superior knowledge, I look forward to the 20 news article threads he's gonna post this week to make up for being insecure.

Awesome.

Spoken like the truly insecure. Oh, the irony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, TheRed said:

Dude has an ego from here to Canada, but it's apparently others who are insecure.

Interesting.

So, people with egos are insecure?

No, it's people who consistently attack people on message boards, including passive aggressively that are insecure. 

I hope that's easily understandable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/24/2016 at 10:30 PM, top dawg said:

You actually want to bring up the Super Bowl considering that our receivers were arguably the main reason, and definitely at least the second reason, why we lost the damned thing?  Seriously? 

I alluded to the fact that Brown may be cut. You or anyone else find where I said Brown or any other receiver would be cut.  Do I think we could have done better than relying on Brown last year? Yep! Still do! 

Lastly, for shits and giggles, show me the post(s) where I flipped my lid about us releasing Boykin. I will be waiting.

 

 

Philly was the best offensive player in the entire Super Bowl from both teams. Dude lit up Talib (one of the best corners though a mental midget) and if he didn't go down we may have had a better chance at winning the game. I highly doubt Boykin would've done anything that game if he were in Philly's spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, thomas96 said:

Philly was the best offensive player in the entire Super Bowl from both teams. Dude lit up Talib (one of the best corners though a mental midget) and if he didn't go down we may have had a better chance at winning the game. I highly doubt Boykin would've done anything that game if he were in Philly's spot.

Brown was doing alright in the Super Bowl until he went down. My thing with him is that you just can't judge someone by one game. 

It's really immaterial at this point. This thread has served JI's purpose and then some.

2 hours ago, csx said:

Brown has more yards and twice as many TDs in the NFL as Boykin. He's done this in half as many seasons. 

That's an incomplete picture. Brown has considerably more snaps than Boykin who basically played one season in earnest.

Neither one has lit the world on fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...