Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why do opposing fan bases and fans think the Panthers don't pay their players?


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

I don't get this fallacy at all.  I've talked to many fans of other teams stating "you guys let Norman go, that's going to be a mistake.  Should've paid him."  or "Letting Smitty go was dumb, because you guys wanted to be cheap."   

Do you guys understand where this poo comes from?  They always think the Panthers let their players go, and don't pay them "like they should."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah all these "questionable" decisions that have long term implications have led to a loaded SB team. At the time the short sighted instant gratification people couldnt comprehend what was comming but a few of us did. I was beating the Gettleman drum in the midst of the smitty fallout. Dude.. We are loaded right now, with our own home grown talent. Hey, lets be the redskins and overpay for other teams developments and barely have any of their home grown. 

 

Yrah, heres what I say about the "should have done this" or "should have done that" statements..

 

image.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like for example, name some studs on the redskins where were origionally drafted by them..

 

the TE Reed? Kurt? 

 

Yeah lets appease the fugtard fanbase and over pay for players that arent our own and dont even fit, to get these fugtard fans to get a cheap buzz watching the other fugtards on NFL network to slob the teams knob and act like they are much improved. Fug off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

Yeah all these "questionable" decisions that have long term implications have led to a loaded SB team. At the time the short sighted instant gratification people couldnt comprehend what was comming but a few of us did. I was beating the Gettleman drum in the midst of the smitty fallout. Dude.. We are loaded right now, with our own home grown talent. Hey, lets be the redskins and overpay for other teams developments and barely have any of their home grown. 

 

Yrah, heres what I say about the "should have done this" or "should have done that" statements..

 

image.jpeg

Dude, this one guy's comeback stated "Smitty put fans in the seats.  He deserved to stay there until he retired."  I was like "uh, we just sold out Fan Fest for the first time ever.  Not to mention, our Training Camp practices have had over 55 thou.  The most ever."  He of course didn't have much of a rebuttal to that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

Like for example, name some studs on the redskins where were origionally drafted by them..

 

the TE Reed? Kurt? 

 

Yeah lets appease the fugtard fanbase and over pay for players that arent our own and dont even fit, to get these fugtard fans to get a cheap buzz watching the other fugtards on NFL network to slob the teams knob and act like they are much improved. Fug off

Dude, this was an Eagles fan.  That's what makes matters worse.  I wanted to be like "did you want us to overpay him like you guys did Asmougha a few years back?"  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nctarheel0619 said:

Dude, this one guy's comeback stated "Smitty put fans in the seats.  He deserved to stay there until he retired."  I was like "uh, we just sold out Fan Fest for the first time ever.  Not to mention, our Training Camp practices have had over 55 thou.  The most ever."  He of course didn't have much of a rebuttal to that.  

you'd think we never lost a game when steve smith was here or something.  i've read so much stuff exactly like that.  and having gone to a bunch of games during his years here i can definitively say that, no, smith's mere presence didn't pack the stadium.

there are some fans who are bigger on players/personalities, which i think is fine.  but it can very easily get emotional and lead to some wildly fallacious arguments.

also this thread is gonna get cpantherking'd because this is kind of his number one pet topic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

you'd think we never lost a game when steve smith was here or something.  i've read so much stuff exactly like that.  and having gone to a bunch of games during his years here i can definitively say that, no, smith's mere presence didn't pack the stadium.

there are some fans who are bigger on players/personalities, which i think is fine.  but it can very easily get emotional and lead to some wildly fallacious arguments.

also this thread is gonna get cpantherking'd because this is kind of his number one pet topic

Meh, it's just negativity when it's our own fan base.  So, it's whatever in that regard.  But, when this fallacy leaks over to other fan bases.  That's what fuging kills me.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, X-Clown on 1 said:

It's because there are only about 3 teams in the league with GM's as good as Gettleman.  Most fan bases are used to seeing their GM throw millions at average, unproven talent.  I for one am elated that we have DG balancing our check book.

i'll lurk on the NFL subreddit from time to time and it's fun to see knowledgeable fans from other teams look at our roster, look at our cap figure, and go slack jawed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you meet ridiculous contract demands you get slammed. If you refuse to break the bank in order to keep all your star players you also get slammed. The solution is to ignore the blowback and do what makes sense for the long term success of the team, which is what Gettleman seems to be doing. 

I see players wanting to play for us. Most aren't saying 'no thanks, you guys are cheap', and the ones who are? Do we want a DeAndre Hopkins, who's apparently so dumb that he thought a holdout would hurt anyone but him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jumpman910 said:

Man I still get people who say we didn't pay peppers.......And I just look at them.  

the funny thing is, hurney actually made a hard run at it at the very end.  i think our final shot at locking him up was $17 million/year in 2010 before he signed up with the bears.  at the time i believe that would have made him the highest paid defensive player in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...