Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Julius Peppers you have been notified


N1kkadeemuz

Recommended Posts

how is that more important than actual performance?

we should have traded this guy. I was saying it all offseason but the huddle seemed convinced we were a better team with him on the squad. We may be better, but we're not $17 million better...

It's basically a testament to how the Panthers are to blame, not Pep...

They paid him, and yet refuse to adjust and allow players to play to their strengths...

I don't blame Pep for wanting out.. Put him on a 3-4, or even a 4-3 that actually makes adjustments and isn't vanilla, and he'd get all these sacks you're obsessed over...

I'd pay him $20 Mil to keep him here..

If you want to be mad about money, be mad about Jake Delhomme...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the nut huggers tell the haters that sacks aren't everything. And now you're using sacks to tell me how great he is? Not buyin it homey! Peppers isn't consistent. He might get 10 sacks per year, but he gets 3 sacks against Oakland and 2 sacks against Kansas City, etc. I don't care if he gets 30 sacks a year. The dude doesn't bring it every play of every game. O-V-E-R-R-A-T-E-D

Sacks are not everything, but you can't overlook an average of 10 per season. If it's so easy to get sacks against KC and Oakland then why doesn't one of the OLB's on the Chargers or DE's on the Broncos lead the league in sacks every year?

I'd love to hear who you would suggest we replace him with? I guess Brayton, Brown and Johnson are really lazy because none of them come close to JP in sacks...

I get it, you hate Peppers - he's the highest paid player on the team so that's where's you're going to direct your hatred...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry, I can't take your opinion seriously with that Cowher avatar, you really think Cowher is our savior? How long did Cowher toil in Pittsburgh before winning that championship? How long did it take Pittsburgh to find a replacement and win another championship?

Bill Cowher coached the Steelers for 15 seasons. 1992-2006. He had 11 winning seasons, 3 losing seasons, and one 8-8 (his final year). He also won 8 division titles! I'm not even talking about Championships. I'm talking about have two winning years in a row (something Fox and company can't do). Sorry, if you want to settle for mediocrity every year with Fox, that's your business. I feel we deserve better!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sacks are not everything, but you can't overlook an average of 10 per season. If it's so easy to get sacks against KC and Oakland then why doesn't one of the OLB's on the Chargers or DE's on the Broncos lead the league in sacks every year?

I'd love to hear who you would suggest we replace him with? I guess Brayton, Brown and Johnson are really lazy because none of them come close to JP in sacks...

I get it, you hate Peppers - he's the highest paid player on the team so that's where's you're going to direct your hatred...

I could have suited up and played as well as Peppers yesterday. ANY DE on the team could have done what Peppers did. So what's the difference. When you get his cock out of your mouth come talk to me. I'm done with this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's basically a testament to how the Panthers are to blame, not Pep...

They paid him, and yet refuse to adjust and allow players to play to their strengths...

I don't blame Pep for wanting out.. Put him on a 3-4, or even a 4-3 that actually makes adjustments and isn't vanilla, and he'd get all these sacks you're obsessed over...

I'd pay him $20 Mil to keep him here..

If you want to be mad about money, be mad about Jake Delhomme...

sacks? why would I give a poo about sacks? Sacks are the only reason people think Peppers is a dominant player. They look at his sack stats over the years, and they think he's one of the greatest defensive ends in NFL history. What panther fans see come gametime is a player with no heart, no effort, no consistency, downright doesn't give a poo, and also has the best disappearing act in the NFL. Why do you think nobody would offer us poo for Peppers? Because we didn't want to trade him? yeah, right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry bro, if you get a hard-on every time you see peppers play to the point you'd throw $20 million at him for doing nothing, that's your business, but don't try to convince us he's worth his paycheck when he's getting a couple of tackles per game, and that it's all the coaches' fault. The coaches make him lazy and worthless...right. He's overrated and overpaid, and we messed up by keeping him here, get over it. If we had $17 million more dollars we could have spent it on a defense...but peppers is sooo totally worth it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry bro, if you get a hard-on every time you see peppers play to the point you'd throw $20 million at him for doing nothing, that's your business, but don't try to convince us he's worth his paycheck when he's getting a couple of tackles per game, and that it's all the coaches' fault. The coaches make him lazy and worthless...right. He's overrated and overpaid, and we messed up by keeping him here, get over it. If we had $17 million more dollars we could have spent it on a defense...but peppers is sooo totally worth it...

$17 million more is in your pocket...

Now, tell me who was out there that you go and spend it on without a trade...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, because the first rule of business is that you tell all the local reporters what goes on behind the scenes...

At least with GM speak I would have figured that they would have said "We did have offers, but none were satisfactory" or something of that nature....but Gantt's article flat out said he was told they didn't get an offer.

Not that anyone here would believe it, but I heard the same rumblings before the report came out...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What he said. People are ready for any chance they get to pounce on Pep if he doesn't make a sack. John Abraham got the same production as Pep yesterday, 2 tackles despite having a monster day Week 1 just like Pep also. Man I guess Abraham sucks now.

Big difference between Pep and Abraham in Week 1 --------- The falcons WON.

Pep piled up stats in a blowout loss. How about piling up some stats in a win!! Now I know that will happen, Pep will eventually (hopefully) have his game or two where he looks dominant but the bottom line for me is the D-Line sucks with him so it cant be any worse without him. This franchise needs to learn how to move on. Look what happened when they moved on from Foster at RB - they ended up with D.Will and Stewart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30 Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
    • He isn't a good HC. I think he has proved that conclusively.
    • The missed tackle percentage is on that screen cap.
×
×
  • Create New...