Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Office Politics--What the hell...


davos

Recommended Posts

Ok so I'm sure plenty here are used to it but I have to vent:

I moved from Denver to California for a job in my field at one of the top firms there is in my industry right now.  3 offices only 60 employees total with a global presence.   Now, going in, I understand I'm low on the totem pole so am just there to impress.  Also, because of California laws, a lot of companies like having the trial type periods before officially going full-time.  My office only has 18 people with 3 design teams so also don't want to be burned by any new hires (which has apparently happened).  Note: The owner is great but one of the 3 principles is his obvious favorite whereas my principle/manager, it's a different story.  

So, I have no issues with anyone and have been on this 30-60 day trial period coming out of graduate school and a year of experience in my field.  5 total professional years under my belt post-undergrad.  

They also hired 2 fresh out of undergraduate with no real experience on 90-day trial plans.  Both are still obviously going through major learning curves.  My principle is the guy who brings the big projects but in a way is the one pushing buttons/being the red-headed stepchild, the other two are super tight with the owner as mentioned.  

So here's the kick:

The "part-time COO" invites me into the conference room this morning to let me know that because they want to be fair to the other new hires on the 90-day policy, they're extending me to their usual policy.  I go: "I understand, but this is hugely important to know because now I have to extend my short-term health insurance another 2 months".  These two younger folks with no real life experience are coasting on Cobra/or their parents meanwhile I am on an IHC short term plan.  She seemed unaware which I found curious and I reiterated, yeah being 29, it's a large expense right now.    

But that's not what got me mad....then I find out the owner's favorite manager slid behind my manager's back and got his new <1 yr-experienced hire approved for a full time contract.   They've been trying to keep it on the DL but I inadvertently found out because they didn't realize the damn ACA has in effect ended insurance extensions for graduate level plans.  Not to mention, I have more of a knowledge base than some of the 2-4 year types in the office so it's just damn frustrating.  

I'm just laying low and letting my manager go to bat for me with the owner but I think it's just a downright sh*tty thing to do knowing I moved from Denver for this, am the only one paying extra, and am still technically in a trial period for 30 more days.  I've been given verbal assurance I'm "getting a contract" but that's nothing to ever take to the bank.  

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

are the undergrads hot?

The one who got it is...sorta.  Asian female but I'd say like a 6.  Maybe they need her for a new bid for minority+diversity purposes.  

The other is a dude--he's one who they're now using as the new guy that they have to be "fair to" who's obviously learning quite slowly but meanwhile, the now full-time girl is still being handheld like CRAZY.

I'm on the team bringing the $20 mil+ projects and she's on the artsy conceptual team losing out on presentations so I'm just being as silent and happy go-lucky as can be but damn, it's a tough blow for them to do that.  I have little respect now for the guy running that team but can never show it.  He cost me money and time bc of his personal politics.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't mean to be a dick, but you are starting on the wrong foot.

Put that poo up, be glad you have a job, put your head down, and work hard.  You will get noticed.

 

Bitch about fairness in the workplace and you will get noticed, but in all the wrong ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, thefuzz said:

Don't mean to be a dick, but you are starting on the wrong foot.

Put that poo up, be glad you have a job, put your head down, and work hard.  You will get noticed.

 

Bitch about fairness in the workplace and you will get noticed, but in all the wrong ways.

Oh no doubt, that's my plan 100%.  Just rubbed me the wrong way for an afternoon but I took it well and didn't overreact/react at all...I'm just using the interweb to vent.  Raised too damn well to screw it up haha.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, davos said:

Oh no doubt, that's my plan 100%.  Just rubbed me the wrong way for an afternoon but I took it well and didn't overreact/react at all...I'm just using the interweb to vent.  Raised too damn well to screw it up haha.   

 

Good for you.  I'm not that old, but been working full time in my industry since the day I got out of college.  I see TONS of guys and gals right out of school making a stink about some of the dumbest stuff, and they typically don't last long/make much money.

If you can rise above the stupid office politics, keep you head down, and do a good job, you will almost always win those petty battles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thefuzz said:

Good for you.  I'm not that old, but been working full time in my industry since the day I got out of college.  I see TONS of guys and gals right out of school making a stink about some of the dumbest stuff, and they typically don't last long/make much money.

If you can rise above the stupid office politics, keep you head down, and do a good job, you will almost always win those petty battles.

Exactly.  It's the little game two guys play and have played probably every year with new hires since they began the office.  I'm just there to impress and enjoy what I'm doing.  :Thumbs up:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Company culture will not change regardless of your position in the company (unless you get to the top) and every company, no matter what it is or their size, has their token asshole(s), complainers, brown nosers, lazy asses, always late, gossipers, office whore (both sexes), the stern one. And it could all be one person too.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never let them see you sweat. Have an amazing attitude and demolish whatever goals they throw up.

The diversity thing can be tough if a company isn't smart and strategic. They will hire someone they really shouldn't and lose someone they shouldn't. Or the one they hire for diversity gets put in a no win scenario or because they do ot wrong alienate everyone. It's a tightrope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...