Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which one of you did this to Mike Remmers's Wikipedia page?


the butch

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

Kind of true.  

Mike Remmers was a big part of our getting to the Super Bowl last year.

If you want to judge him solely by that one game, you're gonna have to bag on several other players as well, including a guy named Newton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Mike Remmers was a big part of our getting to the Super Bowl last year.

If you want to judge him solely by that one game, you're gonna have to bag on several other players as well, including a guy named Newton.

If Remmers didn't get destroyed all game, along with Oher.  Cam doesn't play as bad.  Remmers was putrid Super Bowl Sunday.  Sadly, that will happen again the first game of the season as well, if he's starting.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

If Remmers didn't get destroyed all game, along with Oher.  Cam doesn't play as bad.  Remmers was putrid Super Bowl Sunday.  Sadly, that will happen again the first game of the season as well, if he's starting.   

Why? Because once a guy has one bad game, he can never have another good one?

Funny. in over 40 years of watching football, I've never found that principle to be true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Why? Because once a guy has one bad game, he can never have another good one?

Funny. in over 40 years of watching football, I've never found that principle to be true.

I have zero interest in seeing him vs Von Miller again.  This is going to be bad.  Michael Jackson bad.  I hope they give Daryl Williams a shot.  We've seen what Remmers does vs fast pass rushers.  We don't need to see Super Bowl Sunday again Opening night.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...