Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Play Calling Awful


Lilsmitty09

Recommended Posts

Why was play calling so bad? QB draws and tolbert handoffs after marching down the field passing to KB and Olsen...I just don't understand it. 2nd and 20 and an obvious Cam Newton draw for 5 yards. Over and over again.

Remmers sucks too. He's only good when he plays average/sub par DE's. He got beat by the backups. Sorry but it's just the truth. Just like how we couldn't make a tackle either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are downplaying Remmers too much. I think he did alright. Heck, he's won a few one on one matchups with Miller himself, and that's hard to do. The playcalling had Shula all over it. Really is a downer when you get outcoached, but it's the first game against the best defense in the league. Consider it a step up offensively as to what we can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Lilsmitty09 said:

Why was play calling so bad? QB draws and tolbert handoffs after marching down the field passing to KB and Olsen...I just don't understand it. 2nd and 20 and an obvious Cam Newton draw for 5 yards. Over and over again.

Remmers sucks too. He's only good when he plays average/sub par DE's. He got beat by the backups. Sorry but it's just the truth. Just like how we couldn't make a tackle either.

The 3rd and 1 cam bootleg was just mindbogglingly stupid.. shula just being shula.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, mrohsofunny said:

Also McDermott gets a little from me as well that cover three is easily beat with an average qb throwing and nickel on third and inches really??? Replace Boston for Thompson and play one high.. we really were outcoached AGAIN

God forbid we ask the rooks to press and potentially (likely) get beat from the veteran receivers off the LOS  they'll face this year. 

The rookies playing deep zones essentially kept this game from a potential blow-out. But yeah, they were pretty bad regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...