Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scouts Inc.- Panthers Versus Cowboys


KatsAzz

Recommended Posts

Unbiased POV

QB Dal

RB Car

WR Car (Smith is better than Williams, Moose is even, after then adv Dal)

TE Dal

OL Even

DL Dal

LB Dal (but VERY close)

DB Dal

ST Dal They have better returners, you have a better kicker, but judging by the punt block- you guys have problems elsewhere on ST

Coaching- Car

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QB: both are a choke waiting to happen. he aint much but at crunch time i'd rather have delhomme. in a perfect world i wouldn't have either but jake is the lesser of two evils.

RB: even.

WR panthers. smith>royw. moose>crayton other guys< austin

OL tie. we get the edge on class because we don't have flozer adams having to resort to tripping people to keep romo upright.

DL tie. both underperforming.

LB tie. (how many sacks they got this year?) both underperforming.

DB tie. both suck.

ST cowboys...aint saying much, though.

TE: cowboys

coach: tie

owner: panthers by a mile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread makes me think of all the people who walk up to me at work and say "Where do I log in?" while they are standing right in front of the computer with the giant sign saying "Log in Here."

Reminds me of the scene from Clerks where he talks about the retarded people coming into the video store asking where the new movies are, while standing in front of a huge "NEW MOVIES HERE" sign.

"Oooh look, mini-trucker magazine." :leaving:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm if we go by the first two games of the season, all their positions have outperformed us, especially offensively. Their line has opened holes and protected their QB, ours hasnt. That definitely contributes to why their RB's production is so high. Their QB only has three ints compared to our 6, and gotten more WR production, partly b/c of Romo. Smith will be the best WR on the field, but dont discredit RW, and their depth behind our 1's is better. TE not even worth mentioning, Witten may be the most dominating player on the field unless we decide to cover him. Their defense hasnt been great, no sacks as a matter of fact, but still better than ours. But we know they have a sack machine in Ware, a matter of time before they start drilling people, and our luck... They just lost, we seem to be playing teams at the worse times, while Saints are getting break after break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here's the thing. You compared him to Jake. Jake was signed to the practice squad out of college. Bryce was the number 1 overall. Their expectations are wildly different and so are their contracts. You can talk all you want about what a player is and where they are now and all this other mumbo jumbo, but Jake never had a 5th year option and we weren't talking about the possibility of a top 5 QB contract extension at the end of his 3rd year. What he was expected to be matters because we invested heavily at a cost of future capital, including a 2nd round pick this year, for him to be that guy. The cost to add Bryce took value from the team. To be worth it, he has to add that value back.  Actually, I don't prefer yards, TDs, or only INTs. All those stats by themselves are misleading which is why I said you have to use a lot of different stats. ADOT - Average depth of target.  Completion %. Pretty obvious until you factor in ADOT. 0-5 has a lot higher C% than 10-15%. Hang time. If a pass is in the air for 4.6 seconds vs 3.1 on a 40 yards throw, that gives a DB a lot of time to correct. Is it a loft or is it a laser.  EPA - Expected points added. A way of measuring QB efficiency on every play.  CPOE - ranking pass completions based on several factors, not just the throw.  There's obviously more, but those are the more common.  Typical stats don't show everything. You need to look all over. Looking at a stat line is lazy. That's why I said, you need to analyze everything. Once you start looking at the numbers you start looking at the player. That's why you follow numbers. They lead you places. You look at what happening when the numbers show you patterns. That's where you start finding the problems that yards, TDs and Ints won't show you.     
    • It's not relevant who wins or loses. It's about actually attempting to get better at the position.
    • Thank you. I don't understand how the Bryce stans don't see this. I've never seen a player get more hyped for doing so little. Honestly it's driving me a little insane.
×
×
  • Create New...