Explain the logic

[gakonline]

I believe if you win two challenges you get an extra challenge. Plus, you are only forced a timeout if you lose the challenge. I can see the logic because it was a no brainer it was an incomplete pass. 

[usmcpanthers]

i believe Ron just finally wanted any kind of win, no matter how small.

[JawnyBlaze]

That was less clearly an incomplete pass, even on replay, than that WR was clearly still inbounds when he was down live. So there's that. 

[RoaringRiot]

4 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

That was less clearly an incomplete pass, even on replay, than that WR was clearly still inbounds when he was down live. So there's that. 

Did you really think on page 5 that no one had contributed that already? Come on man...

[tiger7_88]

5 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

That was less clearly an incomplete pass, even on replay, than that WR was clearly still inbounds when he was down live. So there's that. 

Both were crystal clear when they freaking happened.  And they were HD crystal clear on replay.

There must have been something in the refs eyes?

[SOJA]

because if it truly was an incompletion it's no skin off our backs to challenge it. 

If we DONT challenge- then we look like complete dumbasses if we jump offside or they run a sneak 

 

edit: didn't read- someone already answered my bad

[ShutDwn]

3 hours ago, Dick the Butcher said:

 

interesting dichotomy.  

nobody challenges something in fear of jumping offsides. Rivera likely thought he would prevent them going for it.. Last year they'd welcome that challenge.

Let them take the risk of going for it.