Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is it time for Daryl Williams?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

It was against the Saints. How he'd stand up against say the Cardinals is still up in the air.

 

Beasley went off for 3.5 sacks one week after Williams held him sackless. Does it matter who he has faced as long as he is doing the job? And for the last 3 weeks, Daryl has been doing an outstanding job.

 

Why do people have to qualify success? Why can't success just be success?

 

People complain we need to upgrade the T positions. Williams comes in and finally makes that RT position his, and folks are still not willing to give him his due.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

Beasley went off for 3.5 sacks one week after Williams held him sackless. Does it matter who he has faced as long as he is doing the job? And for the last 3 weeks, Daryl has been doing an outstanding job.

Why do people have to qualify success? Why can't success just be success?

People complain we need to upgrade the T positions. Williams comes in and finally makes that RT position his, and folks are still not willing to give him his due.

I'm willing.

I think the problem is that you have some on here who've believed he was an automatic all pro quality starter the moment he was drafted rather than a college kid who'd need time to transition to the pro game (kind of like 90% of the other college kids who get drafted or signed).

More folks need to read Ryan Kalil's book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Williams looked like he didn't have a clue in his first start, which is pretty much what any fourth round pick making his first start in the NFL is probably going to look like.

Since then, I've seen him make progress, which is also what a guy who gets more reps is probably (hopefully) going to do.

Is he ready to start full time?  I'm iffy, but I wouldn't scream if it happened. I've long been of the belief that Remmers is better suited to be a utility backup than a full time starter but we haven't had a better starter available.  If Williams can get to that point, good.

Now, go in with a realistic understanding that his weaknesses aren't the same as the ones Remmers has, but he'll have em.  Same as the young DBs, he's going to make the kind of mistakes a young player makes and if you want to start him, you have to accept that. 

 

They stuck Daryl at LT, which is not his natural position. So him not doing well, was almost a given.

 

The last 3 games at RT Williams has played very well. He has picked up blitzers, he has worked well in tandem with Trai, he is not making penalties or stupid mistakes. All in all, he appears to have finally taken over.

 

I mean, 3 games into your 2nd year does not seem that long of a time for a 4th rounder to grow into a good RT. It makes us better, it is one less position we have to plan for, and dammmm the kid looks good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, iamhubby1 said:

They stuck Daryl at LT, which is not his natural position. So him not doing well, was almost a given.

The last 3 games at RT Williams has played very well. He has picked up blitzers, he has worked well in tandem with Trai, he is not making penalties or stupid mistakes. All in all, he appears to have finally taken over.

I mean, 3 games into your 2nd year does not seem that long of a time for a 4th rounder to grow into a good RT. It makes us better, it is one less position we have to plan for, and dammmm the kid looks good.

His first start was at right tackle, but other than that I can buy in.  Probably not quite as enthusiastically, but yeah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

His first start was at right tackle, but other than that I can buy in.  Probably not quite as enthusiastically, but yeah.

 

Came in for Remmers and did not do well, ah yeah, I remember. Then they tried him at LT, and that didn't go well either. I think that is when most folks gave up on him.

 

But if he continues his play of late? One less position we need to address. It make our Oline that much better. And by George, it is a positive in a season filled with negatives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1st and goal at the 2 against TB. Remmers false start, 1st and goal at the 7. 6yd run to the 1, holding Remmers, 1st and goal form the 17. 2nd and goal from the 11, false start Remmers, 2nd and goal from the 16. Next play, TD Olsen.

 

We still scored, but  man did Remmers make it difficult on us.

 

I don't think Daryl has a penalty. I credited him with a sack, but it was on a play where Dickson had a LB on a blitz, and Daryl did not get there in time to stop the sack. Other than that, no sacks allowed. As a whole, he has given up very few pressures, and has played well in the run game.

 

No way Remmers goes back to RT when Oher gets back. Remmers goes back to being depth, where he belongs.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

The penalties are HUGE and Williams is not getting any. How many does he have compared to Remmers since he has been starting? A clear strength he has over him already.

 

1st and goal at the 2 against TB. Remmers false start, 1st and goal at the 7. 6yd run to the 1, holding Remmers, 1st and goal form the 17. 2nd and goal from the 11, false start Remmers, 2nd and goal from the 16. Next play, TD Olsen.

 

We still scored, but  man did Remmers make it difficult on us.

 

I don't think Daryl has a penalty. I credited him with a sack, but it was on a play where Dickson had a LB on a blitz, and Daryl did not get there in time to stop the sack. Other than that, no sacks allowed. As a whole, he has given up very few pressures, and has played well in the run game.

 

No way Remmers goes back to RT when Oher gets back. Remmers goes back to being depth, where he belongs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We won 5 with the worst defense in the history of defenses.  I think free agency and our draft puts us over 6.5.
    • Leaning towards just ordering this tonight, but now I have no idea on size. Has anyone bought a bunch of jerseys in the last few years and can convey how the Game vs Limited vs Reebok versions all fit? These are both Mediums... The white one here is a Reebok one from 2010, and was when they had the "+2 length" on the tag and it was the version with the stitched numbers instead of iron on... the blue one is from 2022 and is the F.U.S.E Limited version also with stitched stuff, not the "game jersey" with the ironed on numbers/letters that they have the T-Mac jerseys in. The old one fits me fine, the blue one was always a tad snug on me, particularly in the shoulders I'm leaning going with a Large based on the CMC, but for all I know, that is made with a tighter cut due to the higher "limited" level and the "game" ones they have for T-Mac are cut more like a T-Shirt and thus will fit more like the old white one I have here, not sure. (and yes, I already tried going to a sporting goods store here to hopefully try on a Lions jersey to see, but they don't have any right now)
    • I think there's a ton of potential in that WR room. But they really are unproven right now. Hopefully they live up to the hype.
×
×
  • Create New...