Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

That John Brown TD showed exactly why we need a SS


top dawg

Recommended Posts

If we actually had a starting caliber SS who is stronger and more fundamentally sound in coverage, then Kurt Coleman could o back to FS where he belongs. With Coleman at FS, I don't believe that TD ever happens (and Coleman quite possibly would have been in position to get a pick).

Just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we actually had a starting caliber SS who is stronger and more fundamentally sound in coverage, then Kurt Coleman could o back to FS where he belongs. With Coleman at FS, I don't believe that TD ever happens (and Coleman quite possibly would have been in position to get a pick).

Just saying.


Funny how Coleman is basically around every TD but only the few Boston has been around get called out.

Stop trying to talk like you know how the safeties are playing till all 22 comes out.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ShutDwn said:


Funny how Coleman is basically around every TD but only the few Boston has been around get called out.

Stop trying to talk like you know how the safeties are playing till all 22 comes out.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

It was a simple observation based on Boston and Coleman's play at their respective positions this season, and Coleman's outstanding play last season. I could give a poo about the all-22. That's admittedly not my wheelhouse. So, what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looked to me that both safeties stayed towards the outside just a little too long. I have no idea if its because they suck, it was on luke, or if they are just too worried about helping the corners that it slows down their reaction

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Cj72 said:

It looked to me that both safeties stayed towards the outside just a little too long. I have no idea if its because they suck, it was on luke, or if they are just too worried about helping the corners that it slows down their reaction

I think that's fair, but I do miss Coleman at FS (where I know he does everything but suck).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Perhaps, but it still doesn't change my mind about that specific play, nor the general play of Boston and Coleman this year.  Coleman is much more adept at FS because of great instincts.  

That was a play was a post behind the LB to the middle of the field on a cover 2 defense.  If Luke doesn't drop deep there is nothing a safety can do in that situation.  

That being said, everyone looked better today with the pressure we were getting (especially the 1st half).  I think if we start to get consistent pressure like last year, you would be able say yeah Boston sucks, Coleman is better whatever.  But we have not gotten nearly the defensive line pressure we got last year.  

Coleman wasn't making a lot of plays on instinct , he was making plays because he was where he was supposed to be.  If we run as many stunts, blitzes ,etc as we did today, maybe we get more consistent DL pressure and maybe everyone in the secondary looks better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Udogg said:

Coleman wasn't making a lot of plays on instinct , he was making plays because he was where he was supposed to be.  If we run as many stunts, blitzes ,etc as we did today, maybe we get more consistent DL pressure and maybe everyone in the secondary looks better. 

 I would argue that a FS is where he is supposed to be because of good instincts. Boston is more reactionary and doesn't have the ball skills that Coleman obviously displayed last year. 

If Coleman was FS on that play, Brown doesn't make the TD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coleman picked off 7 passes last year and had a pick in the NFC title game. There was strong argument for him to be a Pro Bowler last season. I hated seeing him move after that type of production. I hope we can bring in a legit SS (via FA, the draft, or a trade) and move him back to FS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...