Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Worst 100 movies of the decade


Guest

Recommended Posts

Remarkably, I haven't seen any of these. WOOT! I'd credit my taste in film, but honestly I have to give some credit to Larry the Cable Guy. I hate him like poison and avoid everything he does like the plague (save for 3/4ths of the Blue Collar Comedy Tour movies). And since he was in like a third of these bombs, he made it that much easier for me to avoid them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't think Babylon AD was bad either, it was too short and if they let the director do what he wanted I think the film may have been pretty great. Vin Disel wasn't super bad in it either. Dragonfly shouldn't be on that list, it is a pretty good flick. People hate Battlefield Earth but I never thought it was THAT bad (it wasn't good though).

Worst film I've ever watched is Freddy Got Fingered...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't think Babylon AD was bad either, it was too short and if they let the director do what he wanted I think the film may have been pretty great. Vin Disel wasn't super bad in it either. Dragonfly shouldn't be on that list, it is a pretty good flick. People hate Battlefield Earth but I never thought it was THAT bad (it wasn't good though).

Worst film I've ever watched is Freddy Got Fingered...

I thought babylon was ok until the end...the ending was garbage and thats usually what can make a mediocre film into a bad one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...